ludwig said:If this system only 'knows' engine rpm , I would'nt expect too much of it . IMO , any advance curve that is function of rpm only , can never be more than a crude compromise ..Carbonfibre said:.. the fact that the advance curve can be tailored to work perfectly with any type of engine modifications..
comnoz said:I have monitored the temp in the points cavity and 350 degrees is normal for a stock bike ridden in a sporting manner. I have seen them get over 400 F. when ridden up a mountain pass.
Carbonfibre said:By the look of the "Tri-Spark" system, I would imagine its an old technology multi spark CDI set up, which isnt going to work as well as a properly designed digital inductive system, which can also be programmed.
Carbonfibre said:Is the system programmable, and not quite sure how a digital trigger signal is going to be obtained from what looks like an analog pick up set up?
mike996 said:A solid state system can easily withstand the temps involved IF the proper components are selected. THere are a lot of military or other technical applications where the temps are well above that found inside the points cover of the COmmando. The question would just be whether the appropriate parts are used.
As I have said many times, the Trispark seems to be the only E- system currently available that can actually improve performance over the oem points/AAU - and that improvement is at idle; it is the same in the rest of the rev range. Other E-systems, according to the advance curves, reduce engine performance compared to the points/AAU. And they all require more power to operate the ignition than the points system.
It's great not to have to adjust/replace points but I don't know why ANY aftermarket system is made to revise the ignition curve to one that is less effective for the engine.
I really like the trispark and the fact that it's self contained in the points cover BUT if there is an actual problem here, I would prefer that they separate the trigger and electronics...
L.A.B. said:comnoz said:I have monitored the temp in the points cavity and 350 degrees is normal for a stock bike ridden in a sporting manner. I have seen them get over 400 F. when ridden up a mountain pass.
350 degrees F? I have yet to see the temperature reach 171°F under normal running conditions using a thermal strip in the points cavity of my Commando!
I tried a "C" range (241-309°F) strip (see photo below), but it did not record any temperature reading, (The white area turns black as the temperature reaches the point shown on the scale and is supposedly accurate to +/- 1%).
I then tried a lower "B" range (160- 230°F) strip which so far, has shown the temperature has not exceeded 171°F. I accept the temperature could go higher than 171°F, but 180-230°F higher seems a lot?
comnoz said:Do you have an exhaust pipe in front of your points cavity like stock?