Is this normal?

If that were the case, every 100th crank might have balancing drillings in them.....I think it is more likely the process was based on something like:

'you have 5 minutes to get it as best you can, then move on'

Motorcycle Engineering by bean counter!


And if the factory had invested a little more time on each crank, I doubt the Atlas' reputation for vibration would be quite as bad as it is.

But there is little doubt, an unbalanced 750 Norton motor in a rigid mount is about as bad as it gets! I have ridden a Rickman with an out of balance Commando motor in it! It was unbearable, but on a race track so short track stints! A couple shortened further by bits falling off!

But equally, if they had balanced the Atlas, I assume Norton would have pushed on with the featherbed for a couple more years!
I was told by our mutual Brize Norton pal (RIP) that the factory paid the balancers piecework. So they whacked them out very efficiently indeed… in the knowledge that the isolastics would cover most sins…
 
Completely agree with the above, having served an engineering apprenticeship in just such an environment.
We had to have a 'sample to drawing' stamped off for every batch we manufactured, and quite often we were more than half way through before one was actually to spec.

When I rebuilt my T140 I balanced the crank in accordance with the workshop manual, and it made a huge difference. Before the rebuild it felt like it was ready to blow up above 5k, and afterwards, although it wasn't quite turbine smooth, it no longer felt like it was being thrashed.
 
Back
Top