J.A.W. said:What about Vincatis?, seems there are more than a few of those, -in this part of the world.
xbacksideslider said:They're out there, the lovingly restored, or stock maintained, RD350s.
Thanks for the pIc the Doug Corish Norvin, Acotrel.
No need for megaphones, I guess.
acotrel said:Have you ever ridden a really poweful twin with big megaphones ? A vincent engine in a norton frame is bad enough without making it bloody nasty. The combination of hot cams and megaphones can make a bike into something you cannot ride a round corners without ending up going sideways.
J.A.W. said:Why, yes indeed Frank. These blokes reckon a "minimum of 200hp", & from only 1/2 a litre [500cc].
http://suterracing.com/en/suter500.html
frankdamp said:The prototype Commandos, with what I believed to be 88 bhp in "Stage Three" tune, were more than enough for riding on the street. The mind boggles at the thought of 200 horsepower in a two-wheel vehicle.
Are modern bikes really that high-powered, or is it PRBS? in the brochures.
frankdamp said:The prototype Commandos, with what I believed to be 88 bhp in "Stage Three" tune, were more than enough for riding on the street. The mind boggles at the thought of 200 horsepower in a two-wheel vehicle.
Are modern bikes really that high-powered, or is it PRBS? I remember doing a dynamometer test on one of the Villiers engines (maybe the 2T), where management were very anxious to get 25 horsepower. We did a run on an engine that had the generator removed, no gearbox attached and did a violent throttle slam that just got 25.7 HP. That was the number that went in the brochures. 16 to 20 HP was more reasonable for day-to-day riding.