Show me one report of a valve with interlock causing engine damage.
Glen
Glen, you go ahead and keep your foolproof contraption. Just don’t encourage others to be foolhardy.
Show me one report of a valve with interlock causing engine damage.
Glen
Right, you have nothing.
Glen
I know what you did with the valves.
Not a good idea at all, not sure why you would think it was.
Now you are looking at a different product and tarring it with your brush.
These are manufactured products.
The people who make and sell them make money from this.
On a public forum, you have made a false derogatory statement about their product, one that cannot be backed up. This is not a good idea either.
Glen
the MK3 pump has a wider seal and seal backup that would need to be replaced. I found my anti wet sump MK3 plunger stuck open, it needed to be worked in order for it to be free. The larger diameter seal back up does not fit on some non MK3 oil pumps, the casting on the pump will not allow the backer to sit flush, I had to machine a little off.Also I had to make sure the installed cover with the gasket would contact the seal and compress it in order to insure no leak paths.There was an elderly (ahem)gentleman at Barber one year selling a yellow 750 Roadster. As soon as he got a firm offer, he set about pulling the Mk III timing cover to replace it with an older type. Said no way was he was selling his non-wet sumping cover with the bike. Is that sufficient or does the pump need the AMR-type mods too? The Mk III engine in the SS clone wet sumps very little over time. The Titanic's '73 850 motor drops it's load in no time at all.
I overhauled the oil pump and leave the engine at or near TDC after shutdown.
Drain-back into the crankcase eliminated....
In a court of law you have made a libelous statement. Watch your step.
.
Lineslinger, Please forgive me if this is a stupid question. How do the pistons at TDC help prevent wet sumping?I overhauled the oil pump and leave the engine at or near TDC after shutdown.
Drain-back into the crankcase eliminated.
Everyone has their own way of addressing a problem on their bike, who am I to criticize the aesthetic influence, I'm not riding it and if it works for them more power to them.
When the pistons are at TDC the holes in the crank are at their highest, so the head of oil creating the pressure is at its lowest. The head of oil is the 15 psi of atmospheric pressure over the vertical distance, reduce the vertical distance and the head is less.
Except for the fact that there are weep holes in the connecting rods that align with weep holes in the crankshaft journals when the pistons are at TDC
No, at TDC the weep hole in the conrod is vertical, the hole in the crank journal is horizontal, just checked a crank to confirm. So they are 90 degrees apart.
The big end IS the connecting rod... Your statement above makes no sense.
The weep hole in the big end of the connecting rod is only somewhat verticle, it angles off to one side of the rod arm to squirt the cylinder wall.
The weep hole in the crankshaft journal is pointing at the weep hole in the connecting rod at TDC..