bigstu said:I have just got an 1973 850 MK2a back on the road and would like some advice if possible from more knowledgable Norton folk than me.
I appear to have some oil leaks from my engine. This does not suprise me, as I seem to be quite adept at putting engines together that leak.
No 1 leak deposits oil on the leading edge of the primary drive cover, but is coming from somewhere close to the L.H. exhaust manifold. I can't really see any more than that...maybe the head gasket just under the exhaust?
No 2 leak seems to be coming from the small rocker shaft covers, with their multiple gasket/dodgy bits of tin.
No 3 leak seems to be coming from the the rear rocker adjusting cover, with its sigle nut fixing onto a cover that must act as a large diaphram spring?
bpatton said:swooshdave said:Ducati breather valves, but they are more like $80 or so, depending. Ironically the "trick" think for the Duc folks is to move the reed valve away from the engine and to the airbox. Unfortunately this works better for race motors but the posers don't care.
There must be a reason be a reason why moving the valve works better, I can't figure it out though. There are some pretty remarkable gains to be had by getting the air out of the crankcase. One Commando racer said he was getting 5-6hp out of it. Appears to be a matter of pushing the air around. Formula One and NASCAR guys really work at it.
http://www.coloradonortonworks.com/cata ... e.asp#1713 This is cool, seems like it might be kinda wet, maybe.
fastback said:I was going to order one too , but got too annoyed at paying $20 shipping for a domestic order a $17 part. Call me cheap - but it is more the principle of the matter. I told Mike that I so to. I have no problem paying for a part - just don't pretend it's "shipping"
:twisted:
seaguy said:I've been reading all these posts on the use of the XS reed valve with interest but I can't figure out where one would install this optimaly on a 71 engine. The only vent line I see on it is the one from the cam end on the left front. How about a hose fitting on the place where the tach cable goes since I won't be using a mechanical tach? What have other 71 owners done for this?
swooshdave said:fastback said:I was going to order one too , but got too annoyed at paying $20 shipping for a domestic order a $17 part. Call me cheap - but it is more the principle of the matter. I told Mike that I so to. I have no problem paying for a part - just don't pretend it's "shipping"
:twisted:
At the present time my engine is completely disassembled. If I have to drill vent passages now's the time unless the 71 is the only engine that doesn't make crankcase pressure. I was hoping that a 71 owner might chime in with a few pearls of wisdom.I believe that's a "timed" breather. A reed valve won't do much if your engine is left as is. Are you having specific pressure problems? Excessive oil leaks from joints/seals? If not, leave it alone.
pelican said:would that xs650 valve work ok on an 850?
pelican said:would that xs650 valve work ok on an 850?
seaguy said:To complete the thread for readers Mat from CNW wrote me and said the 71 as well as the rest will benefit from the Reed Valve Mod. He didn't say where it goes , only that they could do it . I guess the timed breather didn't get the job done either.
seaguy said:To complete the thread for readers Mat from CNW wrote me and said the 71 as well as the rest will benefit from the Reed Valve Mod. He didn't say where it goes , only that they could do it . I guess the timed breather didn't get the job done either.
zackybilly1 said:I removed the mounting bracket and ground one of the ears off the valve and installed mine on top of the tank. Used stock hose from the timing cover and a short piece of hose from valve to filler neck. Worked so good, I bought two more for Triumph projects (known leakers).
Best mod you can make for the money.
Z