SteveBorland
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 878
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49ca9/49ca98859eec0f820e1ab58ea3620d46d0c96544" alt="Denmark Country flag"
Yes, but it's much more dramatic, imagine people going around saying "I'm drawn"... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"
Wouldn't it be nice if someone could buy Norton and keep it small, making bikes for enthusiasts in the main but still selling to those that just want a trophy machine. Plenty of both about I think, at least two companies spring to mind that have made that work. Not going to be that easy but where there's hope...........Whoever buys "Norton" will only buy the trademark, and only deal with the bank owning it. The company is history. Whoever picks up the TM will want nothing to do with the tainted decade of the conman's rule.
As Swooshdave says, the 961 has been overtaken years ago by modern emissions and registration rules and the few that were fumbled together in Downington were fiddled through individual approval procedures. They never had a type approval and I doubt they ever passed a noise test unfiddled, i.e. in standard "production" spec. I know how we struggled in 1998 to get the C652 through approvals and that didn't make anything near the mechanical racket the 961 does.
Kenny Dreer's financier Curme did his homework and that is why he ended his adventure in the Norton history. He priced the 961 for production IN CHINA at the time and found it could not be produced at a cost price that made the exercise commercially viable. That was in 2004! Then again, the man actually planned to pay the suppliers- Donington Fall tended to blissfully forget that aspect.
Of course not.961 is done for. European Emissions killed it off a long time ago. It's a zombie at this point, it just doesn't know it's dead.
Drawn is gutted.
I talked to a friend of mine who was the VERY FIRST person who had a 961 road registered in Germany in 2013.the few that were fumbled together in Downington were fiddled through individual approval procedures
Wheels within wheels....
I knew of Spondon, I knew that SG had been associated with Spondon, but I didn't know that it was the 'assets' of Spondon that were used to bring Norton back to the UK. Intriguing stuff!
I talked to a friend of mine who was the VERY FIRST person who had a 961 road registered in Germany in 2013.
He got his bike delivered to Cologne by then (and now long gone) importer Tommy Wagner himself.
And he got it with an EU-Certificate of Conformity Paper.
Where the hell did that come from i ask myself ?
Anyway, when he went to the registration office (Strassenverkehrsamt for german readers) to get his papers, it took them FOUR HOURS to finally print the papers, because according to their database Norton stopped building bikes in 1975 and they knew absolutely nothing about the new company and the importer.
Godet and John Mossey build new Egli Vincent type motorcycles, carbureted, no catalytic convertor, O2 sensors, ECU or ABS.
These bikes are sold into Europe, the UK, North America and Australia.
They don't conform to Euro anything.
How do they do it?
Why couldn't Norton do the same?
Glen
...Gallows
Swissair had to change its name after the grounding in 2001 and following bankruptcy to SWISS so that the new company did not have to take over the debts. But I guess with Norton things might be a bit different. NORT wouldn’t be a nice name either...Numbers of money lost is $30-50MM if you count bike deposits...that was my point about the name. Buyer would have to make good on the lost money. I’m fully aware that the name has been bought and sold many times.![]()
I actually thought that was how they did it in the UK. The bikes that came to Norway were leaned out to the point were they couldn't pull a pram. When they ran at all.Godet and John Mossey build new Egli Vincent type motorcycles, carbureted, no catalytic convertor, O2 sensors, ECU or ABS.
These bikes are sold into Europe, the UK, North America and Australia.
They don't conform to Euro anything.
How do they do it?
Why couldn't Norton do the same?
Glen
Godet and John Mossey build new Egli Vincent type motorcycles, carbureted, no catalytic convertor, O2 sensors, ECU or ABS.
These bikes are sold into Europe, the UK, North America and Australia.
They don't conform to Euro anything.
How do they do it?
Why couldn't Norton do the same?
Glen
Most "new old" bikes are sold as "old". The so-called "new" Commandos by a Midlands "Norton Spares Specialist" were declared as "1971 bikes" for Germany so they could be registered. Which indeed most of their components were- they were nothing but restored old bikes. I know, I saw half a dozen at a dealers years ago, you cold tell the main castings were bead-blasted old ones. I am sure the same trick was used with "new" Vincents etc.
Swissair had to change its name after the grounding in 2001 and following bankruptcy to SWISS so that the new company did not have to take over the debts. But I guess with Norton things might be a bit different. NORT wouldn’t be a nice name either...
Building and selling are different than registering. Many states would not allow you to register a new bike for road use if it can't pass emissions. Or you get an exception. For one off bikes it's a little easier, but Norton wouldn't want to sell one or two bikes a year.