I’ve had a few people message me asking for more info, prompting me to think I’d been too brief with my feedback.
So, for the anoraks, you asked for it...
I've changed such a lot, it’s a very different bike now, in many ways it doesn’t feel much like a Commando anymore. I guess I was expecting a 920 to feel big and lumpy ‘potato, potato’ kinda thing. But it’s absolutely the opposite, it feels super crisp, lithe and lively, it’s revy and it feels very happy at revs too.
It’s low end pull is still very strong, it’s just overshadowed by how good it is higher up the rev range. Although it shakes around a bit at tick-over I didn’t notice vibration other than that.
First off, we have new footrests, clip ons and taller ride height. Small things perhaps, but they make for a different riding position. The clip ons are narrower and the ride height difference is noticeable, it made it feel smaller and a lot more ‘racer like’.
Then we’ve got the weight savings on lasts years bike, 16-17 lbs or thereabouts. This was also (to my surprise) quite noticeable. I think the firmer Maxton suspension also creates a feeling of lightness as my brain equates less sag and wallow to lighter weight!
The combined effect of the riding position, suspension and weight savings made it feel like a small capacity race bike!
But, strangely, the power delivery kinda does too...
The 5 speed TTI box, which has closer ratios, is fabulous, not a fluffed change or false neutral or missed gear, or hard to find neutral all weekend, that’s much more than can be said for the stock box and that’s even though it was my first time out with the box and brand new linkage set up etc. The close ratios definitely make themselves felt. There is a strong synergy effect here with the lighter crank and livelier engine. Again, it feels like a smaller capacity race bike in the way it builds revs and snicks through the gears. I never thought I’d think this, but the bike could even use a 6 speed box!
But I repeat; it’s low end pull is still VERY strong. It would eat a stock Commando off the line. It’s just that this motor gets exponentially better as the revs rise, so bottom end performance is overshadowed by how good it is higher up the rev range.
Of course, twin peashooters are a trademark look and sound of the Commando, and both are absent on mine now. The 2:1 Mike Brooking Maney replica pipe delivers a very different sound. At tickover it’s a tad harsh and makes you wonder what the heck it’s going to sound like, but at revs it sounds SO sweet. It just sounds ‘right’. It is fairly obvious (even to a layman like me) that this is the sound of a well designed set-up. Steve certainly new what he was doing with this pipe / cam combo and Mike has done it justice.
I hope the trackside photographer got some good mid corner shots as that’s really useful in understanding how the suspension is working. Such shots of the bike last year, with the rear end fully bottomed out, were part of the reason for the extensive Maxtonisation of the forks and shocks, so I’m keen to see this years shots. I think I still have the suspension a little too stiff and would imagine there is still some gains to be made in fine tuning here.
I also fitted an Ohlins steering damper. The bike has never gotten into a tank slapper, but to me, it has occasionally felt like it might (probably due to a 50 somethings heightened fear of crashing vs the immortality of youth). I started out with this on a middle setting but gradually backed it off during the weekend. It’s actual effect is now probably more psychological than physical!
Some may recall I had to fettle the clutch plates as they were binding / catching. With this done the clutch performed perfectly, no slip or grab and the lever action with the Triumph type lifter in the TTI box, Commando clutch and dog leg lever is SO light and precise.
So, to the heart of the matter, the engine... first off, although starting is still a very theatrical and tense affair (especially with a large audience) it actually started very reliably.
One very experienced friend said “I’ve had several Vincent’s, it’s all in the technique you know, let me have a go” so I did. He got it on compression and proceeded to seemingly kick against a solid object “you’re pulling my leg” he shouts, “is it in gear”. I wasn’t pulling his leg and it wasn’t in gear. But I’m learning the required technique of easing over compression etc. It takes a while to do that with the total seal rings, but it all adds to the theatrical starting drill! And when it’s followed correctly it usually starts.
As posted before, this engine picks up revs so quickly. Remember, when it’s in gear, quick pick up in engine revs translates directly into quick pick up of rear wheel revs, ie acceleration! But As I said above, I’m not saying that it’s some kind of peaky monster that the torquey old 850 would leave at the lights. This motor would pull away from the stock one as soon as they were off of tickover. It’s just that the higher the revs, the greater the difference. And it gets into those higher revs SO quickly and feels SO good!
I believe the combination of the lighter crank and the JS piston / rod combo combines to enhance this effect.
The motor was still new, so I didn’t want to go crazy with revs and tried not to go above 6,000. Actually, this felt very good, power climbs strongly and dramatically up to 6,000 but it then felt like it was tapering off a little and probably wouldn’t yield all that much in terms of enhanced acceleration by going higher. But with the 5 speed box, changing up at 6,000 put it smack bang in the middle of that strong / dramatic power climb and before I could blink, it was time to change at 6,000 again.
It’s not been on the dyno yet, so things may change, but as it feels currently, I’m thinking that changing up 6,000 is what I’ll stick with as it’s very strong in that range and the engine feels just about as unstressed as I could imagine it being.
All in all I’m am seriously impressed and rather chuffed.