There has always been climate changeI have never denied that the climate is changing .... in fact, I have asserted that it has been changing for millions of years .... why should it stop changing now?
What I question, and no climate change proponent can answer is ..... how much of the change, i.e. what percentage, is due to man's activity?
Slick
Although the birthrate is falling in many countries including the UKThe world population going from 3m to 8m is the major factor.
Yes that's the way I'v looked at it for years. In 1900 there were about two billion people on the planet, until 1800 less than one billion and for the thousands of years before that only millions around the world. The main source of heat, energy was wood, straw and buffalo chips, basically renewable energy. After we started pumping billions of barrels of oil, burning and releasing all that carbon that had been burred for millions of years it's not a stretch to see that the trees now can't cope with that. Of course if you don't think millions of tons of carbon released into the atmosphere by eight billion people annually could cause a problem pleas disregard my ramblings.The world population going from 3m to 8m is the major factor.
Yes that's the way I'v looked at it for years. In 1900 there were about two billion people on the planet, until 1800 less than one billion and for the thousands of years before that only millions around the world. The main source of heat, energy was wood, straw and buffalo chips, basically renewable energy. After we started pumping billions of barrels of oil, burning and releasing all that carbon that had been burred for millions of years it's not a stretch to see that the trees now can't cope with that. Of course if you don't think millions of tons of carbon released into the atmosphere by eight billion people annually could cause a problem pleas disregard my ramblings.
The Great Reset: Journalist Discovers Greta Thunberg’s Early Ties to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum
It's all theatre, nothing more.Are we ‘conflating our conspiracies’ here at all Shane? Wasn’t it Thunberg (and no I’m not a fan) back in 19 that let the WEF have ‘both barrels’ during her presentation? Wasn’t she part of a demonstration outside the WEF in Jan this year.
So, is she a clandestine confidant or a critic - I’m confused?
She didn't "predict" doodly-squat.I've heard that Greta Thunberg has deleted her post from 2018 when she claimed we only had 5 years until the planet burnt up
I can forgive her for her wrong prediction because she was very young...
Are we ‘conflating our conspiracies’ here at all Shane? Wasn’t it Thunberg (and no I’m not a fan) back in 19 that let the WEF have ‘both barrels’ during her presentation? Wasn’t she part of a demonstration outside the WEF in Jan this year.
So, is she a clandestine confidant or a critic - I’m confused?
Can’t see that attachment Shane, I just get a ‘?’.ANSWER....
Facts and / or logic, probably not going to work for you here.Can’t see that attachment Shane, I just get a ‘?’.
The original post seems to have distorted the truth somewhat. Not correct to what she actually tweeted apparently, which was also a reference to another’s words, the original content of which was also taken out of context. There are some facts in the article.
Posts distort 2018 Greta Thunberg tweet on climate danger
Social media users and conservative commentators are taking the climate activist’s 2018 tweet out of context to push the claim that Thunberg is backtracking on a previous stance.apnews.com
I suppose if you pop your head up in that environment (bad pun), you are going to get misrepresented - a lot - if it serves someone else’s narrative.
Its actually even worse she sighted a Harvard Professor of Science's claimCan’t see that attachment Shane, I just get a ‘?’.
The original post seems to have distorted the truth somewhat. Not correct to what she actually tweeted apparently, which was also a reference to another’s words, the original content of which was also taken out of context.
I had no doubt when I heard that she'd deleted her prediction from 2018 that it could be distorted or a misquote or simply untrueCan’t see that attachment Shane, I just get a ‘?’.
The original post seems to have distorted the truth somewhat. Not correct to what she actually tweeted apparently, which was also a reference to another’s words, the original content of which was also taken out of context. There are some facts in the article.
Posts distort 2018 Greta Thunberg tweet on climate danger
Social media users and conservative commentators are taking the climate activist’s 2018 tweet out of context to push the claim that Thunberg is backtracking on a previous stance.apnews.com
I suppose if you pop your head up in that environment (bad pun), you are going to get misrepresented - a lot - if it serves someone else’s narrative.