Jaguar and Norton combo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Onder said:
Thread? What thread was that? :-)
Click to expand...

It was the one where the title starts with the word: 'Jaguar' :-)

Nice photo of it too..... Goes on to mention: ' The E Jag has an alum block Chevy with corvette 6 speed tranny. Either one will get you to your destination on time. '

There's a bit about some old bike, too......

(Trailer doesn't get a mention, though)
 
acotrel said:
My Seeley 850 has the Mk3 frame, but it is pretty much the same deal. He has even got the TTI gearbox.
Click to expand...

Actually, that's a Quaife 5-speed, not a TTI. The outer cover does look similar to the TTI, but it isn't. I don't think the TTI boxes were available yet in 1984. If they had been, I'm sure Martin would have used one. He wasn't shy about spending money on the bike. :D

Ken
 
<wasn't shy about spending money on the bike>

ha ha ha oh, that covers an awful lot of us on AccessNorton!!!
 
lcrken said:
Actually, that's a Quaife 5-speed, not a TTI. The outer cover does look similar to the TTI, but it isn't. I don't think the TTI boxes were available yet in 1984. If they had been, I'm sure Martin would have used one. He wasn't shy about spending money on the bike. :D

Ken
Click to expand...
When I bought my TTI box, Bruce Verdon said his boxes are copies of Quaifes,
 
It is rare to see a Seeley Commando which is so well developed. It takes a lot of experience to get one right. What I have learned, I learned from crashing.
 
If I had a road-going Commando or an E-type Jag, I would keep them as original as possible. What are you going to do with them, if you hot them up ? Their value is in what they are. When you ride or drive them in their original form, you get to experience a part of history. Modified, they are pretty useless. For racing in club events, you can buy much better.
 
'Daytona '87 was the only race the bike managed to finish, ' - Probably too many engine modifications ? Reliability is important, you cannot win if you DNF.
 
baz said:
Now that is a cool combo !
Click to expand...
I remember watched Fred race at Firebird raceway in Phoenix way back when. He was racing the Norton and they were running the "vintage" class with some modern class. The modern bike were launched first followed by the "vintage" class. Fred had worked his way through the "modern" bikes and was first over all when the checker flag came down. I was cool to watch and laugh.
 
N0rt0nelectr@ said:
I remember watched Fred race at Firebird raceway in Phoenix way back when. He was racing the Norton and they were running the "vintage" class with some modern class. The modern bike were launched first followed by the "vintage" class. Fred had worked his way through the "modern" bikes and was first over all when the checker flag came down. I was cool to watch and laugh.
Click to expand...

That was probably this bike, Fred's Commando racer. This is a fairly early iteration of it, at Daytona in 1986. I eventually ended up getting it, along with all his other Norton bits, when he moved on to racing Ducatis and such, in a trade involving a basket case (crashed) Vincent Rapide. Various parts of it ended sold, or in boxes, or on my race bikes, and a lot of them are still around. The ported race head ended up on my grandson's MK3, and the wheels are on my current MK3 restomod project.

Jaguar and Norton combo


Ken
 
This is what Fred moved on to racing after Nortons. This is Fred (standing) and his race bike at Daytona in 2002.

Jaguar and Norton combo


Ken
 
Hi Ken
Funny that. Every project that comes along aquires something from one of the bikes that went before!
 
  • Like
Reactions: baz
Back in the 80s a friend of mine had an E type with a V8 motor that had been built by/for Man in a Suitcase actor Richard Bradford. I sold it for him to a dealer who restored it back with a Jag engine.
 
Chris said:
Hi Ken
Funny that. Every project that comes along aquires something from one of the bikes that went before!
Click to expand...

Waste not, want not, right?:D

And with current prices, I have a lot of motivation to use something I already have instead of buying new.

Ken
 
lcrken said:
This is what Fred moved on to racing after Nortons. This is Fred (standing) and his race bike at Daytona in 2002.

View attachment 97101

Ken
Click to expand...
Definitely a move up the performance ladder. 998 or 996 SPS, or S? I had a 996S with Ohlins suspenders and a few other nice modifications, but it was a street ride. Best bike I ever owned by a wide margin. I'm sure Fred enjoyed racing it.

Ducati dominated WSB with similar for a while, and did OK in MotoGP for a minute. What won on Sunday sold on Monday. I know I'm off topic and offensive, but at least I'm consistent. ;)
 
I built my Seeley Commando 850 in 1978. I did it just because it was a good thing to build, and it was similar to a Gus Kuhn Commando. But I never believed in it because of what was inside the motor. I thought it would be completely hopeless without extreme modification. I finally got around to racing it in about 2003. I have never used any other motor which was so responsive to minor tuning. If you use the heavy crank in a certain way, it is excellent. When I was young, I had many hotted-up Triumphs. The Commando motor is far superior. I think a lot has to do with the rod length to stroke ratio. And the combustion chambers and ports are better.
If I had been serious about racing when I built the bike, I would have extensively modified the motor and probably stuffed it.
I would not use titanium parts inside an engine. If titanium cops a beating, it changes dimension very quickly. With a Commando engine, you do not need lightened valve gear.
 
acotrel said:
I built my Seeley Commando 850 in 1978. I did it just because it was a good thing to build, and it was similar to a Gus Kuhn Commando. But I never believed in it because of what was inside the motor. I thought it would be completely hopeless without extreme modification. I finally got around to racing it in about 2003. I have never used any other motor which was so responsive to minor tuning. If you use the heavy crank in a certain way, it is excellent. When I was young, I had many hotted-up Triumphs. The Commando motor is far superior. I think a lot has to do with the rod length to stroke ratio. And the combustion chambers and ports are better.
If I had been serious about racing when I built the bike, I would have extensively modified the motor and probably stuffed it.
I would not use titanium parts inside an engine. If titanium cops a beating, it changes dimension very quickly. With a Commando engine, you do not need lightened valve gear.
Click to expand...
How does your Seeley compare in vibration to standard commando you said you'd ridden???
 
baz said:
How does your Seeley compare in vibration to standard commando you said you'd ridden???
Click to expand...
It'd be nice if you answered any of my questions regarding you riding a commando acotrel !
 
So judging by the reaction to a reengined Jag, I guess nobody on this forum has a Triton or any other featherbed framed special? :p o_O

Not that I don't understand the reaction. I get a kick out of the hot rodders that claim to have a Model A, or 40 Ford, or-pick your vehicle-with a chevy V8, THM transmission, disc brakes,air conditioning, all leather interior and modern suspension but still think they have an original classic car.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top