- Joined
- Feb 18, 2018
- Messages
- 1,267
time for an ethanol stabiliser thread then……
Or they could use a plastic tank that has a painted cover that allows the plastic to breath underneath . Like a Harley XR1200 has or some dirt bikes .That situation seriously sux!
So the only safe set of assumptions are that you cannot avoid running on fuel that includes ethanol and as such, your 961 tank will likely degrade (an indeterminate amount), over an indeterminate period of time! Two realistic options then it seems - routinely use an ethanol fuel stabiliser or fit an aluminium tank.
Good justification should ’er indoors’ complain about the cost of a shiny new tank! Just don’t disclose the lifetime investment in metal polish required to keep it shiny!
They can , but they need a shell or top cover to look good like a Harley XR1200.Why can't Acerbis (and others) use the same stuff cheap plastic petrol cans are made of?
You're making too much sense man!Why can't Acerbis (and others) use the same stuff cheap plastic petrol cans are made of?
Yes it is, being fabricated now.Hello Mak , Is this going to be a TAB II tank ?
I thought the XR1200's suffered from bulging tanks as well?Or they could use a plastic tank that has a painted cover that allows the plastic to breath underneath . Like a Harley XR1200 has or some dirt bikes .
They expand and contract very slightly , but it won't ever bubble the paint . And , it has never prevented me from getting it off and on or leaked .I thought the XR1200's suffered from bulging tanks as well?
Ring any bells!?
No, no………. of course not!
This is simply wonderful. One thing to take into account is that your classic bikes have been reliable specifically because of one simple circumstance - you have been regularly using them.That hasn't been my experience at all over the last 20 years of owning and riding a couple of 60 year old bikes as well as some young 50 year olds.
As he mentions, these were his experiences and others may vary.
My old bikes have been almost ridiculously reliable. I would love to say that this is because I'm a brilliant mechanic but, with the bikes I've ridden the most, the bulk of the mechanical rebuilding was done by others before I purchased the bikes.
We've done about 60,000 miles mostly two up touring on the Vincent. It has done several 3000 mile round trips from Vancouver BC to central or Southern CA. The only big breakdown was when a Ballistic Lithium battery melted in California. That took out the entire charging system so we had to run dead loss all the way home. I bought a big riding lawnmower battery and stuffed it in the top box. I also bought a battery charger and an extension cord to charge the battery at night. That all worked fine to get us home.
I've done about 28000 on the 1975 Commando and it has been very reliable as well. When I bought the bike in 2003 the seller provided me with shop invoices going right back to 1975. Other than a couple of small upgrades, ignition and braking, the bike is still original, not rebuilt or restored.
I did have one electrical problem with it as well and used a similar method to get home. That lack of charging problem was due to a corroded bullet connector, so down to the maintenance man not doing his job.
The other old bikes here have covered about 25,000 miles in total for us with a few small issues, mostly electrical as well.
I've obviously been quite lucky to cover over 100,000 miles on old bikes, often far away from home base with no recovery vehicle present or needed.
Other folks that I know have had some awful problems with their vintage bikes and some are afraid to properly use them because of this.
Glen