Exhaust Pipe question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mofosheee

VIP MEMBER
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
185
Hello

I have nothing to reference.
The pipes that came with my 73 850 have no balance pipes............. making them probably 750 pipes
Any problem using these presumably 750 pipes on an 850?

Thanks
 
You are probably better off with 750 pipes. The 850 pipes with crossovers are known to crack at the welded joint. Most folks that ride 850s have replaced their pipes with 750 pipes.
 
making them probably 750 pipes

Do they look like these (late 750, used with long lockrings and sealing washers)?...
Exhaust Pipe question


...or these 850 without balance pipe, (used with short lockrings, collets and sealing washers)?...
Exhaust Pipe question


...or these 850 Mk3 without balance pipe, (short lockrings, collets and spherical seatings)?
Exhaust Pipe question
 
Lab...................definitely the first picture (late 750, used with long lockrings and sealing washers)
 
definitely the first picture (late 750, used with long lockrings and sealing washers)

Ok, I assume it already has the long 750 exhaust lockrings...
...or short 850 lockrings could be used with additional sealing washers.
 
I am now onto my 4th 850, having tried most patterns of pipes S & SS as well as 750 non balanced type, I have always found the 850 balanced type smoother i.e. with a non balanced set on the 850 feels harsh.
 
The bike came as a basket case.
The ex pipes that came with the bike resemble picture #1 (posted by LAB). They are new and measure 1.375" where they meet the muffler.
The ID of the used "Dunstall" muffler where it meets the ex pipe measures 1.56" (depending upon where you measure)

Andover Norton shows no bushing to take up this space

Can anybody out in Forum world explain this. Thanks
 
As a related question, I always have questions, some exhaust pipes run close to the frame others much wider. I prefer the close to frame design. Is this a particular year or aftermarket? Thanks
 
Is this a particular year or aftermarket?

 
"No need for the balance tube. Plus, they suck power as proven on Dyno Hill."

I admit to having a little trouble with this since tests in the early 70's produced the opposite result and a balance tube was recommended for performance work.
 
I reckon deleting the balance tube is the way forward today, even without the Dyno hill findings. All pipes now are pattern parts and fit is often less than perfect. Adding the balance tube introduces a whole extra level of complexity to the fit. And potentially a whole extra level of failure inducing stresses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top