Guest (whoever you are?!):
If a 1970 H*rley f'ing Davids*n can have one of these:
http://cranecams.com/index.php?show=bro ... 5&prt=2084, I'm with you on wondering why we can't. Our bikes are *waaay* cooler, damnit! Even the lower end models have adjustable advance curves, rev limiters and independent 2nd cylinder timing. There's also a kickstart/electric start mode that eliminates kickback. (The position of the pick-up poles may be the only thing preventing the use of one of these on a Norton. I'm itching to get my hands on one so I can measure it and see.)
Nortonfan:
Poser, eh? :lol: Those're SuperVenoms my friend.
I agree that Boyers are a worthy upgrade for stock and mildly modified Brit bikes. Their simplicity reminds me of the Pertronix I put on my 1976 Corolla (in 1986). Nothing fancy, but it cut down on maintenance and improved gas mileage.
There's an old Russian saying, "Better is the enemy of good enough." Ironically, when translated to English, the saying could be interpretted as "leave well enough alone." However, in Russian, it means that one should never become complacent and should continually work to improve upon the current setup. Since I love thinking and tinkering - the philosophy fits me well.
BTW, isn't
Kelly Cork one of your countrymen? Seems that's his approach too.
Derek:
Oh, I own plenty of bikes and ride plenty of miles on the Kitsap Peninsula. 'Cept all those bikes have pedals.
My teardown project began in late November and the target date for completion is the INOA Rally in Oregon. I'll bring the f**ing thing there in a trailer if I have to!
Most relevant to this thread, it'll likely have an *old, dodgy, vanilla Boyer MkIII ignition* on it when it gets there.