City Garage
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2018
- Messages
- 939
Voodoo made a good argument. Norton is unknown and even if you will "unfamous" here unless you are older or really into vintage british.I don’t think the ‘mature’ rider who buys the V4 will be too concerned that it’s down a few HP on the Ducati/Aprilia premium track weapons. It is advertised as a road bike with track cred. This buyer will recognise that the Norton V4 is bloody quick, quicker than you could ever use on the road and he/she will likely intend to go nowhere near the track.
The Norton marque is still the holy grail for many bikers (despite some abortive attempts at resurrection) in many countries, but especially the UK. The history and heritage are very important to a lot of people, including me. I don’t know, but do you guys in the US feel the same way about the Harley - genuine question?
Buyers of this bike are not looking for the machine with the highest stats, they want a British bike - they want a Norton. They also want prestige and exclusivity. When you spend 44K you don’t want to pull up next to another three at your local biker cafe. They also want premium components presented as such, carbon and billet and not acres of plastic panels that make one bike almost indistinguishable from the next. I don’t think Norton will expect to sell massive numbers of the V4 but they certainly needed a flagship bike and the V4 was there for the taking.
and I don't know about in the UK but if you are buying a 54000USD bike plus another 5500 in tax, title, fees etc so lets call it 60k you really are getting into rarefied air. Even in a motorcycle heavy area like we are in Los Angeles, that would be a hard sell.
I say that then we also went through the late 90's early 2000's chopper craze of people spending 80k on bikes you couldn't ride more than a few miles and then the money that's currently spent on upgrading Harleys. But again upgrading a 15k bike is a little different.