worntorn said:Rollie Free ran the bike on alcohol fuel. I think it is likely that with everything that went into that motor and with the fuel, it was closer to 100 hp.
With 100bhp, he should have been able to do that speed sitting up ? !
worntorn said:Rollie Free ran the bike on alcohol fuel. I think it is likely that with everything that went into that motor and with the fuel, it was closer to 100 hp.
Rohan said:worntorn said:Rollie Free ran the bike on alcohol fuel. I think it is likely that with everything that went into that motor and with the fuel, it was closer to 100 hp.
With 100bhp, he should have been able to do that speed sitting up ? !
JimC said:worntorn said:JimC said:While I don't doubt official records, some of the undocumented top speed claims by Commando owners reminds me of when I was dating Sophia Loren and Raquel Welch. Only in my mind.
Raquel Welch, for sure I believe that, but Im having real trouble with the Sophia Loren part. I read somewhere that she would only hang with Duc riders, too good for Nortons!
Glen
Nothing says you can't own a Ducati and a Norton at the same time.
worntorn said:Dont forget these runs were at Bonneville, 5000 feet above sea level
worntorn said:And the Burns and Wright lightning with fairing went 186 back in 1955, not sure how they did that.
Technically the Lightning was a production bike, I guess you could call it a production racer.
Anyone could buy one, if they were willing to pay the price and wait a bit. The man who set the record, Russell Wright was a house carpenter who saved his money up to order the Record Breaker.
When did the first Japanese production machine hit 186, maybe 5 years ago, fifty years after the event?
It is rather amazing when you think about it.
The fastest production machine on two wheels or four, a fact not a slogan!
motorson said:In 1977 I did 110 mph (indicated) on Jamboree Rd. in New Port Beach CA. The bike was a 1970 Fastback with a 22 tooth front sprocket and the RPM was 7000. It was missing a lot so I felt like it could have gone a few mph faster with a good tune up.
Somehow the numbers don't always add up.
72Combat said:They banned the R90s from the Castrol 6 hour in Australia because it had...... yes a fairing...gasp.
The R90/6 without fairing was entered and it won...but there were protests...
It had an R90s preload spacer fitted....
( I read this is a BMW article so it may be bias...they even claimed 80 HP from an r75/5)
Matt Spencer said:Balderdash .Definately a Conspiracy . Off with their Heads . :wink:
Black Lightning. One Carefull Owner . Only used on Sundays .
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1951-Vin ... 336d16c330
Not to sure Id let the attentions of these blokes on it . :? :shock:
swooshdave said:72Combat said:They banned the R90s from the Castrol 6 hour in Australia because it had...... yes a fairing...gasp.
The R90/6 without fairing was entered and it won...but there were protests...
It had an R90s preload spacer fitted....
( I read this is a BMW article so it may be bias...they even claimed 80 HP from an r75/5)
Having ridden a /5 I'd say it's closer to 30...