Fast Eddie
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Messages
- 21,548
I put it on Sam.
But I plumbed it in differently. I don’t like the Hyde suggested method as it adds many feet of unnecessary hose.
I cut off the oil return stub on the engine oil manifold (the one that loops around to face backwards) so it now faces forwards.
I then conected that to the bottom of the cooler.
I then took a hose from the top of the cooler up over the engine, T’d off for the rocker feed, and continued on to the old rocker feed outlet from the frame. The restriction is still there to regulate the return flow and provide back pressure to ensure rocker feed.
I then blanked off the old return at the back of the frame spine.
So, the oil is going ‘backwards’ through the cooler. And ‘backwards’ into the frame.
Personally, I do not believe these Hyde coolers cool anywhere near as much as a ‘proper’ multi row cooler. I Therefore do not believe a thermostat is necessary.
All IMHO of course.
But I plumbed it in differently. I don’t like the Hyde suggested method as it adds many feet of unnecessary hose.
I cut off the oil return stub on the engine oil manifold (the one that loops around to face backwards) so it now faces forwards.
I then conected that to the bottom of the cooler.
I then took a hose from the top of the cooler up over the engine, T’d off for the rocker feed, and continued on to the old rocker feed outlet from the frame. The restriction is still there to regulate the return flow and provide back pressure to ensure rocker feed.
I then blanked off the old return at the back of the frame spine.
So, the oil is going ‘backwards’ through the cooler. And ‘backwards’ into the frame.
Personally, I do not believe these Hyde coolers cool anywhere near as much as a ‘proper’ multi row cooler. I Therefore do not believe a thermostat is necessary.
All IMHO of course.