A pipe dream for me FE. Never to be seen in the Land of Oz - so, moot on this beaut!I wouldn’t let that stop you, I’m the same 6ft and 95kg, and although I’ve never ridden one, I have sat on them and the ergonomics felt fine to me.
It certainly felt much more humane than the 961 cafe racer. So it’d practically be a Gold Wing for you….!
Part of the atteaction to vintage bikes, is, back in the day, (it seemed like) EVERYBODY had a bike, and the bikes were interwoven in our social life.I'll predict they will never become collectors items at great prices, more like collectors items at low prices. The young of today who maybe affluent in 20 years time will not even know what a Norton is, they will be into Royal Enfields, Triumphs, KTM's and whole range of Jap bikes.
Same, but I see plenty of modern Triumph "Modern Classics" on the road here.Or not into bikes at all.
Last sunday I saw a T120 1970 and a Commando both in top shape but they were the only old bikes seen on the road in Devon for 3 hours.
Things aren't what they were.
A glowing endorsement of modern Norton and the likelihood of their future success! Warms the cockles of your heart!!I'll predict they will never become collectors items at great prices, more like collectors items at low prices. The young of today who maybe affluent in 20 years time will not even know what a Norton is, they will be into Royal Enfields, Triumphs, KTM's and whole range of Jap bikes.
I have owned a Norton F1 Sport for over thirty years with no dealer back up whatsoever..I always manage to find a way regarding spares. Still using it now and with Andover Norton supplying parts should be using it for a bit longer. Problem is I don’t need another awkward bike from TVS with problematic spares back up.The purchase of a modern Norton for me would mean having sufficient spare cash that I’d be easily able to shrug my shoulders at any prospective lack of spares and customer service that may or may not arise, to such a pitch that if it became a boat anchor or a piece of artwork in my living room I couldn’t care less.
Sure has, and we see the same with F1 prices here, they now fetch about the same or less than a classic.Part of the atteaction to vintage bikes, is, back in the day, (it seemed like) EVERYBODY had a bike, and the bikes were interwoven in our social life.
The bikes we had.
The bikes we wanted.
The bikes we couldn't afford.
Now, many are trying to revisit the glory days of youth.
Decades from now, they'll be restoring & collecting iPhones & Androids.
A friend bought a new Dodge Challenger SRT Hemi.
He wanted to keep the miles low.
I told him to pound the snot out of it, buy new tires every month, and enjoy it. It WILL NOT be a collectors item. That ship sailed.
The V4 was not quite their creation so has no real association to any success in the future they may have, it has no racing pedigree or any other achievement other than being average and expensive. Ask those in the Norton circles you move in, both young and old, in 20 years time will they buy a V4 either a Garner or TVS model, I suspect the answer will be the same as I get here, a resounding no.A glowing endorsement of modern Norton and the likelihood of their future success! Warms the cockles of your heart!!
Harsh !The V4 was not quite their creation so has no real association to any success in the future they may have, it has no racing pedigree or any other achievement other than being average and expensive. Ask those in the Norton circles you move in, both young and old, in 20 years time will they buy a V4 either a Garner or TVS model, I suspect the answer will be the same as I get here, a resounding no.
I'll predict they will never become collectors items at great prices, more like collectors items at low prices. The young of today who maybe affluent in 20 years time will not even know what a Norton is, they will be into Royal Enfields, Triumphs, KTM's and whole range of Jap bikes.
Would it be true to say that you (and the small cohort from the ‘Vintage’ Commando site) believe that anything with a descriptor of ‘Modern’ placed in association with ‘Norton’ is just wrong, by definition? It’s just a sneaky vibe I’m picking up……….!The V4 was not quite their creation so has no real association to any success in the future they may have, it has no racing pedigree or any other achievement other than being average and expensive. Ask those in the Norton circles you move in, both young and old, in 20 years time will they buy a V4 either a Garner or TVS model, I suspect the answer will be the same as I get here, a resounding no.
You mean impossible to counter FE, for obvious reasons - unless ya got a Time Machine!!!!Harsh !
But difficult to counter…
Difficult to tell whether the SV will hold value in the longer term (or ever become an investment). I think much depends on whether Norton reach a level of success and endure, whether they build many more SV’s (the volume in circulation will have affect obviously), or jettison it for further superbikes while ICE are still an option.Well that would be handy wouldn’t it ?!
What’s been on my mind recently is trying to work out what might happen with the SVs future residuals.
Like most ‘proper’ bikers, I have little sympathy for ‘investor’ buyers who lose a bit.
But on the other hand, you’d have to be much richer than I’ll ever be to be able to drop £40k+ on a bike with no regards to its likely future value !
I think Stu is right about the SS. Generally the first generation of anything is the collectible one. And with the SS the story, race history, controversy etc will help that become collectible (in time). As will the ‘this survivor escaped the crusher’ accolade !
However, the SV doesn’t have any of that. It’s ‘just’ a rare nice bike.
As such it is difficult to envisage who might be the possible collectors of these in future. Clearly it IS a nice bike so will never be worth nothing, and it is highly likely to be one of the last generation of high performance ICE motorcycles, but personally I don’t really see it being worth any more than its contemporary’s in years to come.
None of this is a reason not to buy one, you just gotta be open eyed and happy to take the likely financial hit.
How did you manage to reply to something I’d already deleted ?!Difficult to tell whether the SV will hold value in the longer term (or ever become an investment). I think much depends on whether Norton reach a level of success and endure, whether they build many more SV’s (the volume in circulation will have affect obviously), or jettison it for further superbikes while ICE are still an option.
The SV is the first generation from Norton Birmingham and will likely be remembered as the ‘re-engineered version’ - the reliability of which may mean it can continue to be ridden long into the future. I think the Donny original is unlikely to ever lose its ‘comes with critical faults’ tag! Even collectors want their bikes to be runners i guess.
I can only speak for myself but it depends on what type of bike consumers we are. I don’t generally sell bikes, unless I’m moving country of residence (which I’ve done a lot). Others of course change bikes when the first tank of fuel is spent. For me the SV would be an absolute keeper, so no matter its future value.
‘Average’ as stated above does not describe the V4SV. It is a truly beautiful machine and the hand crafted nature (frame, swingarm etc), quality materials, componentry and detail go a long way to explaining the price tag. Yep you can get a more capable Ducati but you’re moving into mass produced ubiquitous territory.
There’s a huge leap to the new Brough Superior in price but I’d be OK parking my Norton V4SV next to one in front of the pub. Might park my Ducati V4SP2-SLS-P1……..around the back though!
Ya must’ve hit post FE . Made perfect sense to me!How did you manage to reply to something I’d already deleted ?!
My diatribe was just that. A meandering waffle of my own thought process. No value for public consumption.
Had they made the Atlas and Ranger model I would have bought one as it would be great for winter commuting, still to this day not sure why they didn't when they were clearly going to be the popular bike. Working in the classic bike trade full time and dealing with customers from all walks of life from around the globe owning a wide array of bikes old and new, I'd say I have a pretty good idea what will be a classic and what will not, including bikes that are now half the price they were 5 years ago and some that are double in certain market places.Would it be true to say that you (and the small cohort from the ‘Vintage’ Commando site) believe that anything with a descriptor of ‘Modern’ placed in association with ‘Norton’ is just wrong, by definition? It’s just a sneaky vibe I’m picking up……….!
Just ‘pulling yer leg’ mate but I do wonder that if you’d owned one, or maybe even ridden one, that might influence your cohorts content somewhat.
FE, as you know and have seen, some bikes will have their day and some don't get a sniff at being collectable. We recently had one of the 3 NRS built by Richard Negus for sale and despite being sensible money it took a long time to sell. Proof that small numbers and being a better bike than the F1 or F1 Sport did not make it popular.Harsh !
But difficult to counter…
I know talk is cheap, but I know SO many people who reckon they’d have bought one of the Atlas’s.Had they made the Atlas and Ranger model I would have bought one as it would be great for winter commuting, still to this day not sure why they didn't when they were clearly going to be the popular bike. Working in the classic bike trade full time and dealing with customers from all walks of life from around the globe owning a wide array of bikes old and new, I'd say I have a pretty good idea what will be a classic and what will not, including bikes that are now half the price they were 5 years ago and some that are double in certain market places.
There are bikes out there that look as good as the V4, better spec and a lot less to buy, potential owners no matter how wealthy do their homework.
That's the advantage of being mindlessly negative about everything all the time; you're bound to be right sooner or laterTime for someone to go "way back" and find our initial posts / opinions of these bikes when first announced, and see who had the best crystal balls...