norton connecting rods

Several years ago I researched Arrow titanium rods, but it seemed strange the big-ends were not through-bolted. I always thought big-ends would be highly stressed, when they stopped the pistons from going upwards.
 
that was my thoughts on the map rods as well
allthough at least

the head of the bolts hit the casing on both sides turning the crank anti clockwise
Do the rods you're talking about look like the picture I included? It's clear in the picture that the bolt heads cannot hit anything.
 
From what I understand those rods are made in China and there seems to be a disconnect in what fits and what doesn't fit.
 
there is no nuts the bolts screw into the rod body from the bottom leaving the head of the bolt protruding from big end
OK, that makes sense. Next question: Are you being sure the small ends remain centered over the crank while testing?
 
I'm guessing you mean the bolt nuts not the bolt heads?
Here's a picture that shows the bolt heads interference with the crankcase. As jay*mac said, there is interference at both the front and the rear of the cases. Please note that this is not a standard Commando engine, but a longer stroke 1007 cc engine, with Maney 93 mm stroke crankshaft, Maney crankcases, and Don Pender rods. So it's an extreme case, with more interference than you would see in a standard 750 or 850 crankcase. But it does show where the interference occurs. The Hepolite, MAP, and Pender rods all look a lot like the Carrillo rods, except, as Jim has pointed out, the Pender rods use 3/8" bolts, where Carrillo uses 5/16" bolts. And on close inspection, there are other small design differences between them. From the pictures, it looks like the MAP and Hepolite rods could also have the smaller 5/16" bolts, but I can't tell for sure.

Rod Bolt Interference 1200.jpg


This is a picture of the crankshaft and rods after grinding the heads of the rod bolts for clearance.

Crankshaft with Nuts Ground 1200.jpg


The only other engine I've used Don Pender's rods in was an ultra short stroke 750 with Maney 75 mm stroke crankshaft and Maney cases, and there was no problem with rod bolt clearance.

I've encountered similar interference problems with a couple of other Commando builds using stock Commando cases, one with a longer (91 mm) stroke crank, and one with Crower titanium rods, both of which required grinding the fasteners for clearance. I haven't had any interference problems with Carrillo rods in either standard or short stroke 750 Commando builds.

That's all I can recall that might be relevant.

Ken
 
If the Hepolite rods do not work without modification, I'm happy to have Wassell update the fitment guide - I just need to know what hits and where.
Greg, this picture shows the two areas, between the black marks, where there is interference. The area at the rear is clearly shown, but the one at the front is not as clear, but the two black lines are still partially visible. These are Maney cases, but the interference in stock cases should be in the same locations.

norton connecting rods


Ken
 
Here's a picture that shows the bolt heads interference with the crankcase. As jay*mac said, there is interference at both the front and the rear of the cases. Please note that this is not a standard Commando engine, but a longer stroke 1007 cc engine, with Maney 93 mm stroke crankshaft, Maney crankcases, and Don Pender rods. So it's an extreme case, with more interference than you would see in a standard 750 or 850 crankcase. But it does show where the interference occurs. The Hepolite, MAP, and Pender rods all look a lot like the Carrillo rods, except, as Jim has pointed out, the Pender rods use 3/8" bolts, where Carrillo uses 5/16" bolts. And on close inspection, there are other small design differences between them. From the pictures, it looks like the MAP and Hepolite rods could also have the smaller 5/16" bolts, but I can't tell for sure.

View attachment 117792

This is a picture of the crankshaft and rods after grinding the heads of the rod bolts for clearance.

View attachment 117793

The only other engine I've used Don Pender's rods in was an ultra short stroke 750 with Maney 75 mm stroke crankshaft and Maney cases, and there was no problem with rod bolt clearance.

I've encountered similar interference problems with a couple of other Commando builds using stock Commando cases, one with a longer (91 mm) stroke crank, and one with Crower titanium rods, both of which required grinding the fasteners for clearance. I haven't had any interference problems with Carrillo rods in either standard or short stroke 750 Commando builds.

That's all I can recall that might be relevant.

Ken
that is the exact same as mine
so it is fine to chamfer the bolts i am concerned
 
I encountered the same problem with steel rods from Don Pender, I did not relieve the cases, but cut a 30 degree relief on the bolt heads once they were installed and torqued
Did you cut them hot or cold ? I bet that that torque was not the same if hot, maybe,I think. Cheers Ian
 
Back
Top