'Devoid of trouble; immediately sends a negative message. If I bought a new motorcycle, I would like to be delighted rather than kept out of trouble.'Devoid Of Trouble' was the message, no? Trouble is, not taking anything away from their competition successes, I believe all postwar machines were Villiers two stroke powered machines of 250cc or less.. Perhaps not the most prestigious of names to conjure with?
Might be there's James, Francis Barnett or Corgi waiting in the wings somewhere?
Or maybe Dot could merge with Cotton and open a factory in Walford??
Al you keep coming out with the same thing over and overBritish motorcycles usually reflect the British mentality - frugal but sneaky. I never believed in the Commando 850 engine, until I used one for racing. 'Some things are so bad that they are good'. To my mind a long stroke and a heavy crank are silly, but it actually works very well. The only thing which stuffed the design was trying to be as smooth as a CB750 Honda - it was never going to be. But I love the feel of it.
I have ridden both. The CB750 is disgusting. The Commando is better, but is that any recommendation ? I would much rather have a Norton Atlas, or a better - a 650SS. I think the only reason people ever bought a CB750 was Agostini's race bike had four cylinders, and most guys had never ridden anything which handled. A 1963 Triumph Bonneville would kill any of them.
I was actually alive back then - where were you ?
The biggest joke was the Honda CBX 1000. - Real fast in a straight line. But who needs it ?
I have ridden both. The CB750 is disgusting. The Commando is better, but is that any recommendation ? I would much rather have a Norton Atlas, or a better - a 650SS. I think the only reason people ever bought a CB750 was Agostini's race bike had four cylinders, and most guys had never ridden anything which handled. A 1963 Triumph Bonneville would kill any of them.
It was an early 750. It seemed to be very good. Much better than a CB750. One of my friends was an A-grader back in the 1960s. In thec 1970s, I watched him win a road race on a Command0 850, which was sponsored by S.R.Evans, a dealer. I have been going to road race meetings since 1954. That was the only Commando I ever watched win a race. The only thing is, a result in a road race does not mean much. There are plenty of excellent bikes which have never won a race.Which commando did you ride Al??
Then you will know what a fantastic chassis the commando hasIt was an early 750. It seemed to be very good. Much better than a CB750. One of my friends was an A-grader back in the 1960s. In thec 1970s, I watched him win a road race on a Command0 850, which was sponsored by S.R.Evans, a dealer. I have been going to road race meetings since 1954. That was the only Commando I ever watched win a race. The only thing is, a result in a road race does not mean much. There are plenty of excellent bikes which have never won a race.
I once saw a Laverda 750 SF in the back of a ute. I waited around for the owner to turn up, but he didn't seem to be around. These days, we probably would not be able to get bits for one.
We all no the history and the reason for the isolasticsThe isolastics of the Commando were designed to stop vibration, because the CB750 was extremely smooth running. I like the way old British bikes feel when you ride them. The CB750 gave me none of that feel. And the bloody thing handled like brick. These days, they are raced in Historic Period 4 , over-bored to 1100cc, and they still don't handle.
I have to laugh. THese days I sometimes talk to Bob Rosenthal. He is the Victorian 500cc historic champion. In the 1970s, he was a sponsored A grader on TZ750s. He has not seen my Seeley 850, so thinks it is a normal Commando. When I talk to him, I know he does not believe me about what it can do. When I built the bike back in the 1970s, I also felt I was wasting my time, but it was just a good thing to build. Because I never believed in it, the bike sat unraced for 20 years. But when I actually got around to racing it, I discovered how good the Commando 850 motor actually is. I absolutely love it. When I race, many of the other bikes have probably got 100 BHP, and they need it !Then you will know what a fantastic chassis the commando has
Maybe try an 850 that's even better than the superb 750
I know how he feelsI have to laugh. THese days I sometimes talk to Bob Rosenthal. He is the Victorian 500cc historic champion. In the 1970s, he was a sponsored A grader on TZ750s. He has not seen my Seeley 850, so thinks it is a normal Commando. When I talk to him, I know he does not believe me about what it can do. When I built the bike back in the 1970s, I also felt I was wasting my time, but it was just a good thing to build. Because I never believed in it, the bike sat unraced for 20 years. But when I actually got around to racing it, I discovered how good the Commando 850 motor actually is. I absolutely love it. When I race, many of the other bikes have probably got 100 BHP, and they need it !
The guys at Norton must have known something about motorcycle motors, I thought that crank was a bloody joke.
I have ridden both. The CB750 is disgusting. The Commando is better, but is that any recommendation ? I would much rather have a Norton Atlas, or a better - a 650SS. I think the only reason people ever bought a CB750 was Agostini's race bike had four cylinders, and most guys had never ridden anything which handled. A 1963 Triumph Bonneville would kill any of them.
I was actually alive back then - where were you ?
The biggest joke was the Honda CBX 1000. - Real fast in a straight line. But who needs it ? Most roads have bends in them.