Okay, back to the subject at hand. I received my 60A durometer mounts from McMaster-Carr yesterday (
http://www.mcmaster.com/#4403k511/=xjumj4), and found that 60A might be a bit stiffer than stock. I did note that the point where the Iso's take over moved up about 300-400 rpm. It's hard to know for sure, since the old mounts are, in fact, over forty years old, and one was heavily oil soaked (imagine that), but overall, they were in surprizingly good condition. They were also marker "Metzeler", echoing 79x100's and Torontonian's observation about the better mounts. An initial check by burying my thumbnail into the rubber seemed to be pretty close to the stock units.
Dimensionally, they are spot-on, aleviating gtsun's concern of incorrect size. That being said, the thread pitch is coarse, requiring new hardware. Not a bad idea to change it out, anyway.
Here's a new item (can you guess which one it is?) flanked by both the "good" and the oil-soaked used mounts. The picture makes the mounts appear different in length, but they're within .020" (not counting the oil-soaked dog).
Note that the stud is about 3/16" longer. This caused clearance issues in only one location, and was as simple as hack-sawing off a couple of threads. I probably could have gotten away with leaving it as is, but the iso's might allow enough movement to score the swingarm. Here it is before trimming:
'Found this while disassembling the right side. Dodged a bullet there!
That, and the oil-soaked unit, might be what caused the change in vibration noted with the new mounts. It's hard to say without having the "proper" mounts to use as comparison.
Before and after on the right-hand side:
The orange doesn't look as bad as you might think, since it's not fluorescent. I'm just thankful they're not fluorescent green! We leave on our trek next Friday, so time will tell.
Nathan