BLIGHTYBRIT/SF
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 1,359
This was last July at NOC bash at the National Motorcycle Museum, this 961 was the well advertised raffle prize
Regarding the TVS statement,is it safe and legal. Certainly looks nice.This was last July at NOC bash at the National Motorcycle Museum, this 961 was the well advertised raffle prize View attachment 85628View attachment 85629
Yes but where is it now?This was last July at NOC bash at the National Motorcycle Museum, this 961 was the well advertised raffle prize View attachment 85628View attachment 85629
I don't agree that it clearly says this. If they wanted out, why did they build additional bikes? They had no obligation. It also says they will support 'their' 961 and says they will sell parts fitted to their 961's....so a positive outlook could be that they will sell parts for their bikes and they may fit the previous companies product, but they make no guarantee. I see that last part as an arse covering exercise and a general distancing from product made under the Garner era. Of course, time will tell what their plans are and your conclusion might be right, but right now, based on that email, I'm not drawing this conclusion. Yet.I think the letter says it clearly, "we will leave you stranded". Look, it's quite obvious. TVS wants to get out of the 961 debacle the sooner the better.
If they intended to build the 961 in any sizeable number, they would have produced it a long time ago while customers craved for it.
The 961 model was on a back burner, now it seems the burner has had a flame out.
To me, it's evident they have put their resources on other/new models.
- Knut
Agreed - let’s wait and see. My guess is that we have’nt seen any of the classic 20, because they haven’t resolved all parts/technical issues yet. It would be incomprehensible that TVS would just push the original Mk2 out of the door dressed as a classic.I don't agree that it clearly says this. If they wanted out, why did they build additional bikes? They had no obligation. It also says they will support 'their' 961 and says they will sell parts fitted to their 961's....so a positive outlook could be that they will sell parts for their bikes and they may fit the previous companies product, but they make no guarantee. I see that last part as an arse covering exercise and a general distancing from product made under the Garner era. Of course, time will tell what their plans are and your conclusion might be right, but right now, based on that email, I'm not drawing this conclusion. Yet.
I am a NMM member (highly recommended) and seem to remember from a newsletter a picture of a lucky chap with his prize. Hence my previous posting - did he receive his non-merchantable-quality bike? Perhaps it was delivered bolted to the plinth it sat in the NMM as an ornament?Yes but where is it now?
Was it delivered?
Is it being used?
Someone on here reported that it was whisked away back to the factory…
And the other 19?
I’ve not seen anything anywhere from anyone about actually taking delivery of one of these (mythical) 20.
Would love to be shown otherwise…
Looks exactly the same to me. Minus the word “classic” on the air box.Here are my pictures of that bike when it was on display:
That’s an old bike, single seat, gold forks…I am a NMM member (highly recommended) and seem to remember from a newsletter a picture of a lucky chap in Suffolk grinning like a loon with his prize. Hence my previous posting - did he receive his non-merchantable-quality bike? Perhaps it was delivered bolted to the plinth it sat in the NMM as an ornament?
And before some wag says it - no, second prize wasn't two 961s...........
View attachment 85631
Yep, total redesign of this safety critical component. The deficiency came out during exhaustive testing and the remaining bikes are awaiting their upgrade stickers before they can be used. Norton cannot guarantee anyone's safety if these stickers are not fitted.Looks exactly the same to me. Minus the word “classic” on the air box.
Oh wait! I get it now, it’s the air box they’re talking about. That’s the part that may or may not fit our SG era 961’s.
Ours are called, sport, SF, cafe racer.
I never thought the air box could be a safety or quality issue.
There does appear to be significantly differences between the 'win me' bike that was on display vs the bike the winner is sitting on (assuming that is the winner on his won bike). I suspect some kind of bait and switch on this one! 'Sorry, you can't have the bike we made due to safety concerns..have one we found on ebay and built by the previous company'. By the way, if you need parts or service....That’s an old bike, single seat, gold forks…
Zero. The moment one rolls out the door, they'll plaster it all over social media.I wonder if any of these ‘classic 961s’ have actually been delivered ??
Which basically means, since no one wants to buy it, we can recoup some money a few pounds at a time.Here are my pictures of that bike when it was on display:
Since when is a motorcycle safe lolYep, total redesign of this safety critical component. The deficiency came out during exhaustive testing and the remaining bikes are awaiting their upgrade stickers before they can be used. Norton cannot guarantee anyone's safety if these stickers are not fitted.
Possible safety concerns are loss of control, fire and brimstone (especially around inner London), bad karma and people laughing and saying 'difference? what difference?'