What are you matching it up to on the rear?
The problem IMO with the 90/90 is the section, not the width, it is a very low profile. So it might not suit your choice of rear. And IMHO they just look ‘wrong’ (I said IMHO… not looking for an argument here) !
The 90/90 has a diameter of 25.5”
The recommended (by Avon) 100/90 is 26.4”
That’s a big difference.
If you want narrow without the low profile, the 3.25 19 is a better choice with a 26.1” diameter.
I run a 100 / 90 / 19 front on the Commando with a 4.00 / 18 rear. I like the bigger contact patch of the 100 (even if that’s just psychological) and this combo gives the same diameters front and rear.
On two other bikes I run the 3.25 / 19 with the 4.00 / 18 and, honestly, that set up seems just as good.
I might try a 3.25 /19 on the Commando one day, but thus far I’ve been loath to tamper with what works !