Re: Engine build prep second round!
Right then girls...
I got this back on the road in summer 2014. Since then I've done a few track days and probably around 2,000 miles, which is not a lot, but they have been quite hard miles.
The engine dyno'd at 56rwhp with 50ftlbs torque, so hardly an R1 beater, but a very healthy increase on prior. It revs to 6,000+ so quickly, this is almost its 'normal' riding! When being 'spirited' it is sweet to 7,000 but there is no benefit in trying to go beyond this (which I have).
I rebuilt it with the RH10 head in box stock spec last time and eventually got around to pulling the head this winter. It will be going to Sir Comnoz for his full attention and treatment, I'll then re-dyno it and road test it for an effective 'back to back' comparison.
So, some update on the motor's conditions:
The bottom end looks and feels perfect. The JS1 cam looks like new:
The barrel doesn't have any perceptible wear, but it does have some scores. These could be because 1) I have been running on unfiltered velocity stacks 2) some of the ceramic coating applied to the combustion chambers came away, this stuff must be very abrasive and could be the guilty culprit:
Jim Comstock did forewarn that he has seen ceramic coating flake off and cause problems. And this would seem to support that. The thickness is uneven and is particularly thick around the valve seat area. Maybe this caused a difference in expansion rates? Whatever the reason, you can see that large parts have flaked away, this has happened on both pots, but much worse on the drive side for some reason. Jim will be removing this coating for me and I do not intend to re-coat:
This ceramic coating failing in the drive side combustion may have been partly the cause of this rather poorly looking piston. Also, when first built, the carbs were very weak on the needle. Having accelerator pumps really hides this (making it difficult to detect) and it will only be apparent on a steady mid throttle cruise. I believe it mildly 'nipped up' on me at one stage and this would appear to support that. Interestingly, the compression, oil consumption and general performance of the engine was all fine. I only saw this because I removed the top end for the head work and 'had a look':
It is only fair to point out again that I have ridden this bike quite hard and its done several track days. I also ran it weak on the needle for a while, the ceramic coating flaked into the bore and I ran it on an entire track day and dyno session with the ign timing accidentally very retarded. That's abuse by anyone's standards I think! Nevertheless, the general wear of the undamaged piston looks very good IMHO:
For those interested in such things (nerds!) here is a pic of a sectioned JS piston, I cut through the centre of the valve cut outs to see what the metal thickness etc looked like:
So there we are. I thought long and hard about taking the motor right down and going the Maney 920 route. But the motor is SO sweet as is, the time, effort and cost involved in such are things I can't really afford right now, plus I really want to see what difference a good head job makes. Therefore, dissuaded, the only other difference will be going from +0.020" to +0.040" oversize pistons, which I doubt would show as a meaningful increase on the dyno.
Although I will definitely not be ceramic coating the combustion chambers again, I am still deciding what to do with the pistons and am currently thinking hard anodised 'DiamonDyze' treatment. I may also get Laystall to apply their Silicone Carbide Impregnation to the bores.
I'll keep ya'll updated.
Now, back t' shed ...