lcrken
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2009
- Messages
- 5,038
I'm sanding a MK3 frame right now to repaint, and noticed something interesting. I've painted quite a few older Commando frames, and the paint job on this one is very different from them. I found the paint on the older frames (1971-1973, mostly) to be reasonably durable, with good film thickness and hardness, with high gloss, and with clean metal underneath. By contrast, the MK3 paint is thin, soft, sands easily, and has lots of rust spots underneath. It's original, and hasn't been repainted, so it must have come from the factory that way. I re-painted one other MK3 years ago, but don't recall whether it had similar poor quality. Does anyone know if there was a change in the factory process towards the end of Commando production? Were the frames that Norton sourced from outside (Italy, Reynolds) delivered bare or painted?
I was planning to just clean up the frame enough to re-paint with my usual Rustoleum gloss black, feather edging the chips and scratches, but not removing good paint. But with all the rust showing underneath, I think I'll have to strip it completely so I can remove the rust. Might be overkill, but sometimes I just can't help myself.
Has anyone tried POR-15 (base plus top coat) as a chassis paint?
Ken
I was planning to just clean up the frame enough to re-paint with my usual Rustoleum gloss black, feather edging the chips and scratches, but not removing good paint. But with all the rust showing underneath, I think I'll have to strip it completely so I can remove the rust. Might be overkill, but sometimes I just can't help myself.
Has anyone tried POR-15 (base plus top coat) as a chassis paint?
Ken