Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator

Gojuu

VIP MEMBER
Joined
Nov 27, 2021
Messages
481
Country flag
I'm hoping someone can help me understand this.

My bike has a breather box "fix" installed and I've read a lot of issues around people having issues with oil in airboxes and with breathing of the bikes. I don't seem to have any.

The understanding I have of the breather box is that prior to them being fitted as a fix the crank case vented to the right side of the rocker cover, vented through the rocker cover, and then to the air box.

Assuming I have that right, what I don't get is, what happens in the "magic black box" that didn't happen when vented to the rocker cover, if that makes sense?
 
Aaaaand, while I'm asking, this isn't factory, is it?

Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator


(yes, I will clean the water stains before I refit it.........)
 
Never heard of a breather box on a 961.
Where is this breather box fixed to you bike?
Can you provide a photo of the box in situ?
 
Never heard of a breather box on a 961.
Where is this breather box fixed to you bike?
Can you provide a photo of the box in situ?
I think Gojuu is referring to the breather separator update.
 
Are you talking about the air/oil separator, a small in-line black box fitted to the breather hose from the crankcase. There was a breather update kit for the earlier models that included it, plus some hose re-routing, filters, check valve, etc.

Ken
 
Aaaaand, while I'm asking, this isn't factory, is it?

View attachment 84901

(yes, I will clean the water stains before I refit it.........)
Yes , That is factory fitted breather plate and RTV. And the black box oil/air separator is just that . There is a low restriction baffle that the vapors run through , hopefully collect and run back to the crankcase. Most of the oil in airbox problems are related to blow by past the rings/pistons. When fitted with properly sized piston/barrel and rings , there is virtually no oil in air box issue. You may be one of the good ones out there ! I think iwilson runs a variation of this that uses the crankcase to rocker cover and then he sends it out to small air/oil separator and then to air (I think). This is working well for him he said. Also, I am running kind of a similar setup , that I would call a primary and secondary system and will post when it gets warmer here . But either way , I will incorporate the air/oil separator in any variation , whether before the rocker box or between crankcase air box or crankcase to air. Or conversely , you can search my posts and find it somewhere on this forum. Keep up the great work , you are really going to enjoy this bike !
 
Look up thread ( Inlet Upgrade ) lot of info there . Here is the thread :

 
Gents - you’ve all understood me - yes, the black plastic oil air separator. Sorry for the terminology.

What I am trying to understand is, if the air/oil goes from the crankcase to the separator - I’m guessing the ideal situation is that the vapour is separated and the oil travels back to the crankcase, whilst the air vents to the airbox - then why couldn’t / didn’t / won’t this process happen using the rocker cover as the seperatorr?

My bike currently has the left and right rocker banjos simply looped together.

What I’m trying to do is, tidy the bike up a bit, and make it simpler where it can be. If that loop rocker doesn’t do anything, I was just going to blank it, but when I got the rocker off, saw that plate in the rocker, I started wondering why it couldn’t be used?
 
Here's what iwilson did...

 
Gents - you’ve all understood me - yes, the black plastic oil air separator. Sorry for the terminology.

What I am trying to understand is, if the air/oil goes from the crankcase to the separator - I’m guessing the ideal situation is that the vapour is separated and the oil travels back to the crankcase, whilst the air vents to the airbox - then why couldn’t / didn’t / won’t this process happen using the rocker cover as the seperatorr?

My bike currently has the left and right rocker banjos simply looped together.

What I’m trying to do is, tidy the bike up a bit, and make it simpler where it can be. If that loop rocker doesn’t do anything, I was just going to blank it, but when I got the rocker off, saw that plate in the rocker, I started wondering why it couldn’t be used?
It may work just fine , try and see.
 
Gents - you’ve all understood me - yes, the black plastic oil air separator. Sorry for the terminology.

What I am trying to understand is, if the air/oil goes from the crankcase to the separator - I’m guessing the ideal situation is that the vapour is separated and the oil travels back to the crankcase, whilst the air vents to the airbox - then why couldn’t / didn’t / won’t this process happen using the rocker cover as the seperatorr?

My bike currently has the left and right rocker banjos simply looped together.

What I’m trying to do is, tidy the bike up a bit, and make it simpler where it can be. If that loop rocker doesn’t do anything, I was just going to blank it, but when I got the rocker off, saw that plate in the rocker, I started wondering why it couldn’t be used?
Wasn't there someone a while ago who indicated that on hard braking, especially going down hill, oil could flow into the vent line that runs from the rocker cover to the oil tank, and allow oil to flow back from the tank into the rocker cover?
 
Wasn't there someone a while ago who indicated that on hard braking, especially going down hill, oil could flow into the vent line that runs from the rocker cover to the oil tank, and allow oil to flow back from the tank into the rocker cover?
Yes , That is correct and why Norton lowered the oil level in the tank too . And the best way to get crankcase pressure out is directly out , not through the rocker cover. If Gojuu tries it both ways he can decide which is better. l know when I had it the old way (through the rocker cover) , I had oil in my air box especially at freeway speeds 70-75 mph . If he is trying to clean it up , block off the banjos like some others have done which looks good. But please try your experiment first .
 
So, I think I've copped out. I read what I could and never came to a conclusion that convinced me I would improve it. It's worth noting my bike hasn't had an oil in airbox issue, so I'm not really trying to do anything but clean it up.

What you probably can't see in the photos is how awkward the rocker "loop" was. It was pretty much jammed against a whole bunch of parts around the injectors and throttle cables, and it really was out of place. Having had that apart a few times now, it annoyed me every time - especially knowing it did nothing.

So tank, rocker etc all off and this:

Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator


was replaced with:

Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator


I'm pretty happy with the outcome. In the scheme of things it probably isn't major, but I'm happier with it. It gave me the space to route some of the cables better and I routed the now unused IAC connector up under the tank and sealed it off:

Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
 

Attachments

  • Breather Box / Oil Air Seperator
    1645851213866.png
    502.5 KB · Views: 111
@iwilson - trust me I am completely aware it’s still there. I’ll end up coming back to this……..
I have no doubt! You're clearly a man on a mission. Note the above photo still had the clear breather tubes I fitted to observe what exactly was going on!
 
@iwilson - trust me I am completely aware it’s still there. I’ll end up coming back to this……..
The later type oil/air separator hose were different then the early one you have. On a Domi , they had to run it in your current position . But on later Commandos the box is positioned higher and closer to the airbox , so you see much less of it. And I think it looks better . Have a look at a late model 961 Commando and see what I mean.
 
The later type oil/air separator hose were different then the early one you have. On a Domi , they had to run it in your current position . But on later Commandos the box is positioned higher and closer to the airbox , so you see much less of it. And I think it looks better . Have a look at a late model 961 Commando and see what I mean.
I know exactly what you mean. Are they the same seperator? I think it looks better as it seems much more hidden behind the frame to my eye.
 
The separator is exactly the same , what is different is the hoses they used to reposition it.
 
Back
Top