I would like to get back to discussing why people are disenchanted with the 961 . I understand unreliability and breakdowns . I read a new member not liking the experience at 80 mph.
I wonder what he was expecting ? More reserve power , smoothness or stability ? The reason I bring this up again is because after riding a few more bikes recenly I can say that the Harley Sportster Engine is the nearest similarity . They sell a bunch of those over here. I think the 961 offers a unique experience and actually gives lots of reasons to buy one. BUT if you never had a Vintage Commando it may be asking too much for newcomers to warmup to it. Like I said in another thread , the new Engines and bikes Norton are making need to bring in younger riders. And those bikes need to be reliable and fun to ride with good fuel economy. Norton has really taken it on the chin with the early 961's especially here in the states . The more I think about it , I believe that Norton would have been better served to keep the 961 in England where they would have greater control over things. Then once things got sorted out , reliability , supply chain etc. then go for the larger markets . Instead , now their reputation kinda sucks here. To a long time Norton owner and supporter like me it's very dissaponiting!