Fast Eddie
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Messages
- 21,641
Looking at the two in front of me, the T140 pin is 1/16 bigger in diameter than the 850 Norton pin, however, they are actually shorter, so I wasn't really being fair in my initial comparison.splatt said:Right back at the start you said the Triumph pins were bigger but lighter,I thought that's strange they are both 11/16'' pins, but yes the Triumph pin is about 0.0013'' bigger so it would lend itself very well to repairing any tired rods or piston problems, as some one was trying to do in another post
Nevertheless, my basic thought still stands, the Triumph pin is a lot lighter, and that is largely due to the internal taper removing a lot of material.
Interestingly, they are also both incredibly rough inside, with lots of (to me) clear opportunity for stress points to start. The fact that this doesn't happen, again leads me to conclude that there is a large excess of strength in these items.
So I still think there is plenty of very safe scope to play with here. This is probably how the aftermarket manufacturers save weight, better machining means more material can be removed whilst not compromising strength.
But I'll reserve judgement until I've let a more qualified machinist have a good look at them.
It seems to me that there is also a lot of excess material on the sides of Norton pistons, around the wrist pin area, this could easily be removed, saving weight and effectively turning the piston into a slipper piston.