- Joined
- Feb 7, 2010
- Messages
- 4,195
xbacksideslider said:highdesert said:Regarding Norton fitting the rubber line to handle the hydraulic fluid for the disc brake:
Did Norton have a choice on this?
Were braided steel lines available in the early 70s that they could have fitted?
I seem to remember the bikes from all the manufacturers fitting rubber hoses for their disc set ups.
Your suspicions are correct. Our great protectors - the government, the DOT specifically - had not yet approved braided stainless steel lines for highway use. Therefore it was illegal to use it on a motorcycle. All those guys in the late '70's and '80s who bought braided stainless and improved the function and reliability and safety of their bikes by installing it were, and still are, subject to criminal enforcement. Same as if you remove a smog device.
Same BS with all the new bikes' fugly fender/taillight extensions and the illegality of mini LED turn signals. The location and size of the rear tail light/signals is dictated by DOT.
DOT regs assume incandescent bulbs and dictate the area of tail light lenses and the area of turn signal lenses therefrom. The regs fail to allow for the possibility of increased brightness. A tiny blinker can be more visible than a big one, if its an LED as opposed to an incandescent bulb. The burden is on the OEMs to get it changed . . . . at great cost.
Innovation is squashed by safety crats.
But, like all laws, enforcement is arbitrary. Never heard of anyone getting a ticket for any of the above examples. The safetycrats get their little rocks off and the citizenry are more or less left alone to carry on as if nothing happened.