- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 5,403

Speak to Murray at Cyclecraft Engineering on 08 9361 4619. He may have something or know a good bike.
Wise words Baz - that last line is a pearler!The thing is most people with an old bike are hands on
They get as much enjoyment working on these bikes as riding them
Now with a commando there are things that can and will go wrong
But every single thing has an upgrade and a commando can be surprisingly reliable
You have to remember how old these bikes are
If you don't plan on wringing it's neck (like I do) and you carry out normal regular maintenance it'll be fine
If you have the money go for a cnw one
If you don't then go for one that has had a long term owner if possible
Even the much maligned combat can be ok with the right care
The bikes to avoid are the freshly restored ones that have done no mileage
I've seen it too many times mateWise words Baz - that last line is a pearler!
You might be referring to the Combat models. These were 750 cc and built in 1972.Ok so what kind of things can i expect to have to fix on the road with my tool kit and what maintenance is necessary to keep these bikes running without too many issues ? I seem to remember a problem with the Nortons from my early years having issues with something in the bottom end of the engine ! Can't remember what ? I am also interested in how many kms you can expect to get from one of these engines if looked after ? And, are there any models/years that I should avoid when buying ?
Thanks Glen, I would prefer to get a MK3 if possible and I have emailed CNW to ask about a bike mentioned earlier. It's good to see that if they are looked after the engines do last. Have you got any idea what the cost would be for a top end rebuild in one of these bikes ? I assume there are no inerrant problems with the bottom end or gearbox, but please correct me if i am wrong.You might be referring to the Combat models. These were 750 cc and built in 1972.
They are a bit higher in performance than earlier 750s but there were lots of engine problems.
Many people run them today in a detuned state. That seems to work.
In general, as with most bikes, as time went by models improved, weak points were found and corrected. The 72 Combat was an exception to this, and that is due to the increased performance that was a bit too much for that engine.
After that Norton went to a larger strengthened engine in a lazier state of tune. The idea was that it would give similar performance to the Combat with reliability.
The MK3 850, the last Commando built, had scores of little changes including stronger crank and cases.
But the earlier 850s and 750s work just fine with some care.
A friend is just completing a rebuild of his 73 850.
It has done 128,000 miles with one top end rebuild at 60,000 miles.
Glen
One of the local club members told me a few decades ago...strange things start to go after 100K miles.An owner in UK has had a 850 from new, now showing 280K miles. Yes engine has been rebuilt a few times but it shows they will do the miles.
Yes, memory, flexibility, time between bathroom stops and also hair!One of the local club members told me a few decades ago...strange things start to go after 100K miles.