MikeG
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- May 31, 2012
- Messages
- 1,308
That's because neither one is a state. Both have representation in the house where they are allowed to participate in the deliberative process but not vote on the actual bills. I believe a change to the US constitution would be required to change this. Personally I would rather see term limits ensconced there rather than adding more rubber stamps.Interesting comment but of course 100% incorrect.
The phrase " Taxation without representation" was made famous with the American Revolutionary wars. Against the British king. Not really known for his Marxist political views.
Strangely enough the best known modern examples also come from the USA. The citizens of Puerto Rico and The District of Columbia pay US Federal Tax. But do not have representation in Congress.
So rather than a Marxist agenda the facts seem to show in modern practice it is a USA Republic agenda.
Always pays to check the facts first.