The method used in the Norton factory 2LS kit can be faked with a lot of work. The hard part is manufacturing the cam and pivot with studs on top to mount the stiffening ring.
I can't compare the alloy plate, except to comment that when many of these parts were designed (50 years ago) the weight diff was the only consideration (and it's unsprung).
How much stiffness was need for function was simply not understood, and aluminum is far more flexible than steel for the same cross-section - an alloy plate has to be 3 times as thick to have even the same effect: Young's Modulus: aluminum 10, steel 30 (* 10^6), and you have no weight saving at all. If you increase stiffness by 50% (which may not be enough if you can see it bend) it must be 450% as thick and 50% heavier (although some structural shape changes can help here).
They made the same mistake with pushrods...
If you have some pics of the plate, we may be able to figure out where it can be improved with minimal work, min weight gain and min cost?
I can't compare the alloy plate, except to comment that when many of these parts were designed (50 years ago) the weight diff was the only consideration (and it's unsprung).
How much stiffness was need for function was simply not understood, and aluminum is far more flexible than steel for the same cross-section - an alloy plate has to be 3 times as thick to have even the same effect: Young's Modulus: aluminum 10, steel 30 (* 10^6), and you have no weight saving at all. If you increase stiffness by 50% (which may not be enough if you can see it bend) it must be 450% as thick and 50% heavier (although some structural shape changes can help here).
They made the same mistake with pushrods...
If you have some pics of the plate, we may be able to figure out where it can be improved with minimal work, min weight gain and min cost?