Stephen Spencer

Status
Not open for further replies.

Voodooo

VIP MEMBER
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,725
Country flag
Stephen
Instead of mudding up peoples post and threads, I thought it would be more fitting for us to start our own thread.

Here is my response to you.



My dear love HippOptimus.

1) My guesstimating calculation would be 20 or so. (Can you prove me wrong? )
And I’m meaning in actual owners hands in the real world since the take over of TVS and their own “Cafe or Sport 961”.
Not the left overs or rebuilt Donington bikes.

2) Of the whole world of motorcyclists, let’s narrow it down to the motorcyclist who like classic looking, air cooled, push rod, modern retro type bikes. Of the millions who are in this category, only a very small handful are actually interested in the Norton.
And by very small, I mean VERY SMALL.
So small that if Norton only had the 961 to sell, they would be out of business today, they cannot make a profit on the 961 and stay in business with this bike. This is a fact.
I’ll bet a years worth of income on this.
Are you a gambling man?

All the others in this category that like modern retro styling and have and will continue to buy Triumphs, Harley’s, Royals, Ducatis, Mv, And all the Japanese retro styled bikes.

3) According to your optimistic views, the interest is already out there and enough interest is there for TVS to survive solely selling in the UK.
How did someone as small and poor as Garner get the 961 into the worlds hands, yet the giant TVS with deep pockets refuses to do so?

No reason why TVS can’t sell the Nortons through world dealerships of other shared brands. All major brands often sell through dealers that sell competitive brands.

Example: Triumph, BMW, MV, Zero, Indian, Harley all sell at the same dealership.

4) Garner.
The conman, the pension fraudsters that you helped out by buying his product. Yes Stephen, you helped a known criminal.
Yet you fail to help financially support TVS Norton.
You claim you want TVS Norton to succeed, but you disapprove of their pricing for such a premium product.
You fail to purchase parts and pay the asking prices set by TVS.

It seems to me, you do in fact see my point of why many people have no interest in buying something that cost more than its actual value and return. Meaning the 961.
I’ll give you yet another example.

Why pay £20-25k for a 961
When one can buy a Brand new Triumph Thruxton, which has way better performance, quality, and is also beautifully designed for less?

Kinda like why you don’t feel the need to pay $1200 for a Premium Norton seat.
Get my point?
You don’t see the seats value as TVS sees it. The same as why many motorcyclists don’t see the value in the 961.


No where did I ever say Norton had no intention of selling bikes. Show me where I ever said that.
I also never said they would never sell us parts. If you followed along, I said many many times over the course of 3 years that I could not get the spare parts.
I even mentioned that I finally gave up.

You on the other hand, were given the opportunity to get the parts you requested and you yourself decided it was too pricy. You made the decision to decline the items that you were asking of.

I at the time, wanted carbon fiber replacement parts. A new plate holder, chain guard, rear mud hugger, sprocket cover, rear sprocket, cush rubbers, etc. They asked me over and over for part numbers. Numbers I didn’t have access to.
When it was all finally somewhat resolved, TVS again made it clear they didn’t feel comfortable selling to a Donington made bike, even though the parts I was requesting were obviously left over stock from the purchase of Donington.

Stephen Spencer
 

Attachments

  • Stephen Spencer
    IMG_6843.png
    289.4 KB · Views: 42
Not appropriate to open a thread in someone else’s name Voodoo. Change it to something appropriate or close it.

I‘m happy to exchange views with you, including those opinions and conjectures masquerading as facts and those mischaracterisations you seek to legitimise through repetition. ‘No worries’ as we say down under!🙂👍
 
Last edited:
Not appropriate to open a thread in someone else’s name Voodoo. Change it to something appropriate or close it.
Agreed - this forum should be about what we share in our common love - not picking on differences.
You have lowered the standard @Voodooo .
Cheers
 
Well since the entire Australian continent is going after Scott I feel as co-captain of the Americas cup Norton I will jump in here.

Everyone should read the opening statement and relax

Stephen
Instead of mudding up peoples post and threads, I thought it would be more fitting for us to start our own thread.


Threads get opened up in peoples names all day long there’s another thread that was opened up in Stephens name and I don’t know how many Jim Comstock threads and other threads with names. So to say we’re lowering or whatever the complaint is it’s just ridiculous that would be like saying somebody starting a city garage thread and highlighting my posts. My post are there for everybody to find and see and I think what Voodooo was doing was bring them out so they would be held on there own and whatever discussion would ensue even as repetitive as It gets

There was no personal attack, there was nothing in what was posted that hasn’t been seen before.

I really think the point was instead of hiding behind other posts in multiple threads it was to bring it out into the open in one place


Personally I say grab some popcorn and let them banter on this thread as maybe they will finally find some common ground and we might all get a laugh
 
Better yet, let's all declare peace in the banter wars, and move on to other more productive pursuits!🥱
 
@City Garage I’d like to at least counter propose we update the name to “Stephan and Voodoo”

And American?!? Aren’t you Canadian?!?
How about this.

What if I change it too. “Its Stephen’s fault 2.0”
Or can only Aussies do this to each other?

Stephen asked me a series of questions on another persons thread. As I stated, I don’t find it appropriate to hijack someone else’s thread.
It derails the topic and literally goes off course.

So to respond to his questions, I started this thread in his honor.
Here, him and I can discuss and chat about his dislike of anything I say “negative” about TVS.
It is after all, Stephen’s own dislike that if I say anything at all about TVS, he gets offended.
Even when sometimes my comments aren’t directed towards him.

“It’s ok when Stephen takes any of my post personal, yet he finds it acceptable when he makes remarks about myself.


I‘m happy to exchange views with you, including those opinions and conjectures masquerading as facts and those mischaracterisations you seek to legitimise through repetition. ‘No worries’ as we say down under!🙂👍



I’m happy that Stephen is happy. So he agrees this is the right place to exchange views with each other. See, we can agree!

I just find it offensive that he accused me of saying or spreading, conjecture masquerading mischaracterizations to legitimize through repetition. 😃👍

Stephen from here forward I’ll “take everything you say with a grain of salt”
As we say in America.
 
Oh come on @Voodooo , as if I only see the flag when I say something. I don’t even care that @City Garage is Canadian.

Having said that; I’m sure that any minute now every non-961 owning guru will arrive with their view and to remind us they don’t like 961’s. That’ll help us all band together…….
 
How about this.

What if I change it too. “Its Stephen’s fault 2.0”
Or can only Aussies do this to each other?

Stephen asked me a series of questions on another persons thread. As I stated, I don’t find it appropriate to hijack someone else’s thread.
It derails the topic and literally goes off course.

So to respond to his questions, I started this thread in his honor.
Here, him and I can discuss and chat about his dislike of anything I say “negative” about TVS.
It is after all, Stephen’s own dislike that if I say anything at all about TVS, he gets offended.
Even when sometimes my comments aren’t directed towards him.

“It’s ok when Stephen takes any of my post personal, yet he finds it acceptable when he makes remarks about myself.


I‘m happy to exchange views with you, including those opinions and conjectures masquerading as facts and those mischaracterisations you seek to legitimise through repetition. ‘No worries’ as we say down under!🙂👍



I’m happy that Stephen is happy. So he agrees this is the right place to exchange views with each other. See, we can agree!

I just find it offensive that he accused me of saying or spreading, conjecture masquerading mischaracterizations to legitimize through repetition. 😃👍

Stephen from here forward I’ll “take everything you say with a grain of salt”
As we say in America.
We say 'pinch of salt' on this side of the pond. 👍 🇬🇧
 
Oh come on @Voodooo , as if I only see the flag when I say something. I don’t even care that @City Garage is Canadian.

Having said that; I’m sure that any minute now every non-961 owning guru will arrive with their view and to remind us they don’t like 961’s. That’ll help us all band together…….
Where did I even say a single thing about city garage?

I was referring to your comment of “Stephen and Voodoo”.
You started a thread titled
“It’s Stephen’s fault”.
Did you forget?

And once again, CG Isn’t Canadian.


It seems to me that all of this is all because I simply started a thread only to answer questions that Stephen himself asked me.

Would it be better to hijack every thread you and other members start when the often controversial disagreements take place and derail the original discussion of the thread? I think not.

If you don’t like the fact that this very thread that was meant for Stephen and I to discuss our own subject and questions, you’re free to ignore it or move on. It’s not hurting anyone. You simply have the ability to not read or comment here. It’s quite simple.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top