Valves bounce back off the seat at high RPM from inadequate closing ramps. And Spintron tests have shown that the Norton cam flexes enough that it can actually push back on the lifter (after the valve hits the seat) and lift the valve the same as valve bounce. A half moon bronze support under the cam center helps eliminate cam flex.
Someone please help Jason Wright with photo posting options. There should be a link somewhere on this forum.
I was wondering if a spring could be used at the follower itself to control it, then spring pressure can be lessened at the valve so its sharing the load
Yes it all has been done before but its all about the Norton twin!You could design an engine with over head cam, and use hydraulic cam lifters, and yes it has been done on a bike
Yes it would hold it to the base circle so it could wear moreWouldn't that hold the follower against the cam base circle, would the extra contact time cause increased follower wear?
Yes, but how long can you keep flogging a dead horse ? The engine was designed in the 1950s with many, many attempts to upgrade it! Sooner or later, you are going have to sit down with a clear head and a blank sheet of paper to avoid any recurrence of the original issues.Yes it all has been done before but its all about the Norton twin!
But its not dead its living mightier than it ever did! though people not giving up and striving!Yes, but how long can you keep flogging a dead horse ? The engine was designed in the 1950s with many, many attempts to upgrade it! Sooner or later, you are going have to sit down with a clear head and a blank sheet of paper to avoid any recurrence of the original issues.