Restoration adding modifications, butchery or?

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://coloradonortonworks.com/catalog/engine.asp

In order to install this kit the engine needs to be completely stripped down as we mill a mounting surface on the lower backside of the drive side case half. We also modify the timing case half.

There is one Commando engine that was built that will allow the breather to be installed even if the engine is all together. This is the engine built through 1972 that has a large tubular breather installed on the backside of the cases. So it’s located inbetween the transmission and the engine.
 
My thought on this subject is why not do everything reasonably possible to make the bike work better while staying mindful of the overall original appearance and character.

On character, a friend modified his 69 750 with lightened valve train, 11 to one cr, porting,hot cam and lightened race crank. He now has a bike that requires avgas, tends to stall out when the light turns green, and has lost most of its midrange punch.

It does go like a Banshee once the revs finally get up there, but this is of little use for a road bike, maybe not even for a race bike on most courses. He told me the other day that he now realizes what an expensive mistake it was to try to modify his Commando in this way.
"When I get on my brother's 850(stocker) and feel the torque I think, What have I done?"
 
grandpaul said:
I'm talking about a simple reed valve case breather setup.

So where is the relevance than with respect to the original question whether the OB mod would be considered butchery? :wink:


Tim
 
Hey,

So there is a lot of stuff going on in this thread but I am posting just to make sure the installation of the Comstock breather is clear.

- The std breather mod, will need the cases to be machined in order to be installed. This would be the 1969-71 and the 1973-75.
- The breather mod for the 1972 model (with the pre-existing breather on the lower back side) can be installed without removing anything other than whats there already. I dont know where 'lifting' information came from, but its not needed. Its tight for sure, but we have a lot of them installed with great results.
- Then of course, there is a new development from Jim that replaces the large sump plug with a very cool breather assembly. This is a very simple install but you need to ensure you have a large sump drain in order to use this set-up.

In all of the above appliactions the breather will work better if the holes going into the timing cavity are plugged. If installing the -72 model breather, then you may not want to do the timing chest blocking (if the engine is all together), and it will still work great, just not 100%.

Matt / Colorado Norton Works
 
debby said:
Yeah, I'd like to know. I've got one of Comstock's breathers on the shelf, waiting to go on my 750. I was hoping it could be done in situ but I haven't looked at it that closely yet. Looks like the main issue is if there is enough clearance to get a wrench on the mounting bolts and get them out.

Oh come on Debbie, you got little girly fingers. It's not too tough to get in there and install the valve on your 72 case without removing anything.
[of course if you would have made an appearance for dyno day I would have helped you] Jim :D
 
Matt Spencer said:
...., restoration bordering on insanity ,...

Erm, that thing looks slightly better and more complete than my "Rotten commandos". :shock: I'm in for the "Most improved 202x"! with "x" approaching 10. :wink:

unless you had a Commando parts tree .

I don't have a parts tree - I just know where Joe lives (but unfortunately he still demands payment when I need parts. Cheeky huckster .... :mrgreen: )


Tim
 
WELL GP IT LOOKS LIKE YOU WERE WRONG as this is straight from the source

CNW said:
- The breather mod for the 1972 model (with the pre-existing breather on the lower back side) can be installed without removing anything other than whats there already. I dont know where 'lifting' information came from, but its not needed. Its tight for sure, but we have a lot of them installed with great results.


Matt / Colorado Norton Works
 
bill said:
WELL GP IT LOOKS LIKE YOU WERE WRONG as this is straight from the source

Well, I admit it.

I just know I couldn't get one off without moving a bunch of stuff and loosening it to BARELY manage to get the 2 bolts off and back on.

Now, I have seen the only pictures available of the CNW breather kit, and it has FOUR bolts; so, not sure how that's all done unless the inner plate is held on by 2 bolts, and the rest of the kit bolts onto that?

Bill, you still didn't say how YOU did it, if you ever actually have installed one...
 
Tintin said:
So where is the relevance than with respect to the original question whether the OB mod would be considered butchery?

I have personally NEVER used the word "butchery" in ANY reference to any modification, by anyone, on a Commando or any other bike other than perhaps this one-

Restoration adding modifications, butchery or?


Truth be told, it was BADLY ABUSED, but not "butchered" which would imply no chance of return to some semblance of normalcy. Here's the proof-

Restoration adding modifications, butchery or?


So, for the original poster, all is not lost, nor will it be, if you do some mods that many others have done with very good results.
 
Tintin said:
So where is the relevance than with respect to the original question whether the OB mod would be considered butchery?

As to the Old Britts mod, I just know that Fred has had excellent results on the street, and on the track, with his mod.

And now for the statement that is anathema:

"That's GOOD ENOUGH for me".
 
it is a sad attempt to fix a problem and creates another one. as long as this has been perpetuated on the web SOME take it as gospel. you still have a LARGE hole with NO type of filtration to stop trash from reaching the oil pump, you have removed the weir so you no longer have the protection from the crank trying to force oil up the original breather hole. I will say it again GP YOUR QUOTE "that's is good enough for me" just helps make my point you should NOT be charging VICTIMS for you work and profess to be a professional!!!!!
grandpaul said:
As to the Old Britts mod, I just know that Fred has had excellent results on the street, and on the track, with his mod.

And now for the statement that is anathema:

"That's GOOD ENOUGH for me".
 
I find that the OB mod works fantastic. I have the old breather location blanked and a GPZ reed in place at the old mag boss.

Restoration adding modifications, butchery or?


Restoration adding modifications, butchery or?
 
bill said:
it is a sad attempt to fix a problem and creates another one.

As soon as you convince the INOA to remove it from thier tech digest, you'll get a lot more people taking heed of your negative statements.
 
pvisseriii said:
I find that the OB mod works fantastic. I have the old breather location blanked and a GPZ reed in place at the old mag boss.

HOW DARE YOU!

You are taking your life into your throttle hand, you know...
 
I will let Dyno Dave answer this one as he has a LARGE hand in the new one that is in the works, BUT I have a feeling that is one of the changes that will be in the new edition.
you can call it negative BUT EVERY THING I have stated is FACT as to the result. IT does work BUT there have been improvements as to how to accomplish this but a FEW on here REFUSE to advance with the times!!!!


grandpaul said:
As soon as you convince the INOA to remove it from thier tech digest, you'll get a lot more people taking heed of your negative statements.
 
There's a gal on list that told me she could get to the Combat breather bolts when i couldn't. Even if I could its be so injury prone strain and swearing I now remove cradle bolts to lift engine, which ugh must be done to get tranny out as breather fouls the forward tip of shell to clear cradle.

I'm pleased the reed valves measured to works, prior attempts had found them un-responsive as hi rpms.

You can't completely plug off the TS case as there's an oil drain and feed needed to establish oil level for chain/cogs. 1/4" size not much to bother about with oil in the way too.
 
Damn the torpedos, GP.
If I may expound on hobots comment, Blank this one off too, ya goobers, and see how long it lasts. And if I may add, if you don't blank ALL of the TC off, then what is the point. That way is big enough to nullify any vacuum that you believe you have attained.

I think the thought here should be to relieve pressure. There are many solutions and maybe too many opinions to keep focus.

I will warn you all right now that i am not affraid to take this debate to a hole new level. :mrgreen:

Just to be clear, this is the set of case that got replaced (un reinforces, blown out spindle bore, stripped drain plug, etc. Not Comat material.)
Restoration adding modifications, butchery or?
 
bill said:
...you can call it negative BUT EVERY THING I have stated is FACT as to the result.

The ONLY thing I'm calling negative is your comments relating to the simple breather setup that will always be the easiest for a quick and effective fix.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top