robs ss
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2016
- Messages
- 3,549
On a statically balanced crankshaft put a 20g weight on the outside of the left cheek.Always happy with "agree to disagree" but try reading again. I'm fine with whether he was right or wrong and you disagreeing with him. Instead, you simply attacked him personally and nothing more and you should notice that I didn't respond to the post where you attacked him (post #12). In post #14 you expressed an opinion on a basic premise that I agree with. It's the manner in which you call someone out.
In this particular case I don't personally know enough to say who is right or wrong. It is an interesting subject just because of that. Your attitude that you know and others are stupid/wrong/etc does not give me any knowledge because you give no reason why you are correct. Is it training, experience, because you studied it, a God-given bit of knowledge, a simple opinion, or what?
If you read through the thread you'll see posts making a list to take to the "machinist" or "balancer" or "dynamic balancer". In my opinion some are simply regurgitating what they've been told because:
1) Any machinist is a joke in my opinion. Must be someone knowledgeable and setup to balance old British twin cranks.
2) They must be told the balance factor you want. You specified your opinion in one post and another guy did in another.
3) Then as most have said, he must have all the rotating parts to weigh, or you must provide that weight.
4) If you actually want it "right" for your application or desired outcome, you forget 3 & 4 and tell them what weight bob weights to use what they are allowed to do to the crank to achieve balance.
How critical the individual component weights are to each other is not clear to me or how much weight differences for the different components left and right affect the final results. For instance, weighing the bottom of a rod verses the top of the rod on both sides. Or is it correct to weight each side's components and average the two, or what? Is dynamic balancing actually better than the original static balancing that was done, if so, why?
Then put a 20g weight on the outside of the right cheek, same radius from centre as the left weight, but at 180 degrees from it.
If done correctly the crank will still be in static balance.
Now spin it up.
The torsionally induced imbalance will be significant, and have an negative effect on the bike that engine is fitted.
Dynamic balance, put simply, is just an analytical way of removing those 20g weights.
Last edited: