Thems all trigonics , Moit .
Neither Joey Dunlop, Trevor Nation, or Mike Hailwood ever had their hands on this set, yet would have raced on the same products! For those that don’t...
www.ducatiforum.co.uk
NdI thoughtitwas a KR 84 rear ? Thats a 76 Front . a 327 compound I think was thestickyone . Funny story theier . No , IT HARD . Some people think your try'n to pull one .
The PROBLEM withem is the teeter totter . Your stable CRANKED OVER . Front ( and rear ) the CENTRAL DRAINAGE GROOVE is why they tramline , follow road ridges , and camber to a degree .
Twith Twith . Less relephant full tit . But did I tell you about the Track Join in the club track Pukekohe . Anyone at the foist C R M R C do should remember , Dont get yourself aft of the rear axle.
The ballance aint then good .
By the Way .
PUSH on the BARS in a Speed Wobble / Weave . It DAMPS IT . Pull Back - Its liable to throw ya round and amplifyit . Like a Z1 or other kwickersaki .
Ive never cottoned to the K 70 F , K81 R on the oily trpls . Seen one that accomplished my theory . Hit a car at 80 . The K 81 brakes GOOD , Layed Over . Astonishingly so , on occassion .
While the front'd wash out , full brake , layed over , on a K 70 . Unless you use the berm .
They were K - 81 , untill ;
Front was still KR 76 , but they wereabit quickerthanthat . SEE the SHORT SIDEWALL . Tough as Old Boots . the CASING .
The Amorican K 81 R from around 80 , was A LOT stiffer in the casing / carcasss . So they wouldnt blow in death valley .
On your Goldwing , bagger , loaded , and throw the wife . Legedly they were developed for THAT . But had other uses .
That theres NOW a T T 1 0 0 .
Crikey .
OOPS.
SORRY ABOUT THAT .