- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Messages
- 41
Jerry, some of it could be as simple as assigning a "Thread Moderator" who would be tasked with attempting to keep things on point and balanced.Jerry Doe said:Perhaps we should have a technical category, subdivided into engine, gearbox, clutch frame, wheels, etc.
Here members could post dissertations on some subject he feels particularly knowledgeable. However, discussion and comments would have to be limited to avoid pollution of the post, and having it deteriorate into insult slinging.
Hi Slick - I have thought about this before and it will have its problems. Mainly because who should be qualified and be considered an expert and give the advice? That's a fine line.
For some technical areas things should be quite simply if we are dealing with facts versus ideas. For example, someone is interested in engine component weights -
http://www.accessnorton.com/norton-engine-component-weights-grams-t21317.html
That could be be under - Technical / Engine / Pre-Commando / Weights-Dimensions-Part#'s
or something like that. In such an example, the biggest job for the "Thread Moderator" would be ensuring the values were identified as being grams or ounces, etc.
I think a "Technical" section with sub-groups as above, might be a good starting test area to see how things work. No need to open everything up immediately, just one or two sub-groups of the greatest interest and see what works, what needs to be adjusted and what creates problems. Perhaps for example:
Technical / Electrical / Ignition / Commando /
and have a listing of all available setups:
Stock
Boyer
Pazon
Tri-Spark
etc.
There could be a "Poll" area at the top where people click on the system they are running and this would show how many are running what. Doesn't mean that the most used is the best, by any means, but it would provide an overview. Then with that there could be sub-groups for discussion of each system if desired.
Just an idea.