SteveBorland
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 858
Turbofans work by blending huge amounts of cold air from the front fan with the small, hot gases which have been through the core. This gives an increase in thrust and cools the exhaust, reducing the noise considerably. The engine bay and access doors are also designed to contain more noise than on the early jets - you may recall the requirement for "hush kits" to be fitted to older passenger jets to allow them to continue operating. Military jets tend to be less concerned about noise generally (look at the problems in many places where F16s are to be replaced with the F35 for example), and anything high speed is going to using a turbojet, since the turbofan has too much drag at high speed. Then there is the vast increase in noise (and thrust and fuel burn!) when reheat is used - see the previous comments regarding Concorde on takeoff.BBC is just a political operation at this point. Sad because we NEED a neutral reporting out fit. There aren't ANY!
One point about the Concorde or rather two points would be that when it was retired it had a lot of airframe time and that is not something that is cheap or easy to fix especially as that is a pretty bleeding edge aircraft. The second thing is that engine design has made huge progress in efficiency and noise reduction. I grew up on the flight path of an USAF base and jets were a LOT louder than the fans they use now for transport work. Sure, fighters on climb out are still rather noticeable!