Nuff said !At the last Cadwell meet, Andy Molnar's Manx best lap was 1:48.53. Tim Horton on his ex Gary Thwaites 1007cc Seeley Commando best lap was 1:51.26. Tim and Andy can both ride fast, but the Manx won.
Told you before mate… yours would be much faster if the frame wasn’t orange…Its been the case at all circuits for many many years. Only Gary was up there on Daves Seeley Commando. Over race distance its two different groups.
ALRIGHT! Enough of the mumbojumbo, getting back to arguments based in reality!!! HA!Told you before mate… yours would be much faster if the frame wasn’t orange…
When a Seeley has more trail it stays more upright in corners like a Manx. It over steers more than a Manx. If you do not gas it hard as you enter the corner you do not notice the oversteer.In the Scandinavian series it´'s like this: Up to 1972 500cc. Close between a Paton, a Petty Manx and a G50Seeley. In up to 1972 750cc. Same guys on overbored Petty Manx and G50Seeley. Then way slower CommandoSeeleys.
To me it seems that there is no big difference in lap times between Seeley and Manx frames. Both handles well. A good rider might prefer one or the other. Even read about a top rider in the fifties that liked the 7R better.
But there is more to frames than geometry and weight distribution. Stiffness in different directions play a big role. Just think about that when leaning hard, knee and maybe elbow close to ground, how does suspension handle a bump when force comes sideways.
Even with modern computer aided analysis you are only close to best chassis design. The final design is determined by the MotoGP riders. Valentino Rosso is said to give best feedback of them all.
Are Seeley G 50s fast.When a Seeley has more trail it stays more upright in corners like a Manx. It over steers more than a Manx. If you do not gas it hard as you enter the corner you do not notice the oversteer.
No rider in their right mind should use full throttle as they enter a corner.
Try it. You could be the next Marquez
If you are on full lean out with the others in the procession then frame rigidity and tyres are more important. But not if you can blast up the inside. You just need to be careful of the others coming down as they leave the corner.In the Scandinavian series it´'s like this: Up to 1972 500cc. Close between a Paton, a Petty Manx and a G50Seeley. In up to 1972 750cc. Same guys on overbored Petty Manx and G50Seeley. Then way slower CommandoSeeleys.
To me it seems that there is no big difference in lap times between Seeley and Manx frames. Both handles well. A good rider might prefer one or the other. Even read about a top rider in the fifties that liked the 7R better.
But there is more to frames than geometry and weight distribution. Stiffness in different directions play a big role. Just think about that when leaning hard, knee and maybe elbow close to ground, how does suspension handle a bump when force comes sideways.
Even with modern computer aided analysis you are only close to best chassis design. The final design is determined by the MotoGP riders. Valentino Rosso is said to give best feedback of them all.
If they’re pre 63 spec they ain’t short stroke 4 valvers Al.We have Molnar Manxes in Oz . They only race in a pre 63 class. I must be a complete idiot. The rake on the Seeley is 27 deg
Our rules are flexible. Out of sight is out of mind.If they’re pre 63 spec they ain’t short stroke 4 valvers Al.
Unlikely. As demonstrated by the fact that Norton drew up a 4 valver themselves. However, Andy is not hampered by the politics, or budget constraints that Joe and the race dept allegedly faced (well documented). He also has the benefits of 60+ years of advanced human knowledge, continued development at the forefront of highly competitive racing, and access to machine tools that Joe couldn’t have even dreamed of.Is Andy smarter than Joe.