The numbers on the side of my carbs are: L - 932/30 & R - 932/29.
Would this be right, or has there been some swapping from the previous owners?
That list is useful, but can cause confusion. Amal essentially goes by calendar year and when they received orders from manufacturers. A "1974" Commando is not like others. Norton had no "model year" and often dates have shown up in marketing documents, part lists, or workshop manuals that add to the confusion.My bike is a 1974 (built 09/73) 850 mk2.
The numbers on the side of my carbs are: L - 932/30 & R - 932/29.
According to this link these carbs are for/from a mk1.
Would this be right, or has there been some swapping from the previous owners?
I don't have that supplement. Could you share a link so that I can get the parts numbers for these?Both pairs had the same specification (same main jet, needle jet, needle, slide, spray tube) according to the Amal list.
Confusion is rightThat list is useful, but can cause confusion. Amal essentially goes by calendar year and when they received orders from manufacturers. A "1974" Commando is not like others. Norton had no "model year" and often dates have shown up in marketing documents, part lists, or workshop manuals that add to the confusion.
For instance, Amal lists R932/42, L932/43 (PACK 114) for a 1974 MKIII. There is no evidence that Norton ever actually bought/used R932/42, L932/43 and the MKIII, although they were being built in 1974 are not considered to be 1974 bikes - again, marketing. You'll also find that Amal does not list the carbs actually used on MKIIIs.
Which Amals were actually used by the factory for the MkIII?That list is useful, but can cause confusion. Amal essentially goes by calendar year and when they received orders from manufacturers. A "1974" Commando is not like others. Norton had no "model year" and often dates have shown up in marketing documents, part lists, or workshop manuals that add to the confusion.
For instance, Amal lists R932/42, L932/43 (PACK 114) for a 1974 MKIII. There is no evidence that Norton ever actually bought/used R932/42, L932/43 and the MKIII, although they were being built in 1974 are not considered to be 1974 bikes - again, marketing. You'll also find that Amal does not list the carbs actually used on MKIIIs.
I don't have that supplement. Could you share a link so that I can get the parts numbers for these?
Which Amals were actually used by the factory for the MkIII?
Thanks very much for that.Note that the Mk2/2A supplement has no diagrams so the ones included are from the Mk1 parts book, therefore, not completely accurate for either the Mk2 or Mk2A.
It's different from the parts list I have (which I downloaded), that starts from engine No: 212278.
Keep in mind that your "1974 MK2" could have easily started life as a MK2A and is now a MK2 - except for the mufflers, my rider did before I got it.
Deleted (wrong parts list).Thanks very much for that.
It's different from the parts list I have (which I downloaded), that starts from engine No: 212278.
Yep, it is indeed.It looks like a Mk2 probably back home from the USA.
Thanks very much for that link.The last table on this page: https://www.gregmarsh.com/MC/Norton/CommandoID.aspx shows the carbs by models along with details and footnotes. AFAIK, it is correct- at least no one has disputed anything in a long time. In the details, the jets are what Amal says was right originally and what they deliver today. There may be differences in what parts books say.
Keep in mind that your "1974 MK2" could have easily started life as a MK2A and is now a MK2 - except for the mufflers, my rider did before I got it.
My bike is a 1974 (built 09/73) 850 mk2.
The numbers on the side of my carbs are: L - 932/30 & R - 932/29.
According to this link these carbs are for/from a mk1.
Would this be right, or has there been some swapping from the previous owners?