- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,118

Yes, I agree if he meant nothing was working. I assumed that "nothing" meant there was no voltage showing at the white wire at whatever point it was checked.
A new battery does not mean a good battery. Load test it before starting on the rest of the fixes.
I didn’t. The brown/blue is connected to the battery +. Is that wrong?Did you try connecting the ignition switch brown/blue NU (from battery negative) to NG (lights except for the headlamp, Edit direction indicators/blinkers brake light and console warning) and UY (headlamp only and console main beam warning lamp)?
Yes. Brown/blue should be connected to battery negative. Red wire to battery positive.I didn’t. The brown/blue is connected to the battery +. Is that wrong?
Brown/blue NU connects to battery negative as the standard electrical system is positive earth/ground.The brown/blue is connected to the battery +. Is that wrong?
Ouch, thanks so much. I am going to do that today. I do have a starter motor. For some reason the br/bl wire with the fuseholder has a ring terminal with red on it. Connected to the neg terminal on the battery is only a heavy gauge black cable which goes to the starter motor via a relay. The positive terminal has a heavy gauge red wire that goes to the engine as a ground and the br/bl wire. Hopefully i did no damage.Brown/blue NU connects to battery negative as the standard electrical system is positive earth/ground.
Edit:
![]()
Connect only the heavy gauge "Engine Earth" starter positive cable (normally black not 'red' as shown on the Mk3 wiring diagram) to battery positive.
Although drawn on the diagram (crossed out) and a red "Earth" wire with a ring terminal is included in the harness, do not connect it to battery positive if the starter motor is connected.
The positive terminal has a heavy gauge red wire that goes to the engine as a ground and the br/bl wire.
Hopefully i did no damage.
What’s strange is that the heavy black cable that comes from the battery negative to the relay then to the starter has been like that since I restored the bike some 15 years ago and I rode it tons.
I had a crank seal in primary break apart from kick starting after significant amout of wet sump oil in cases.Success, thank you so much! One more question. When I stopped riding the bike it had new oil in. I have an anti-drain valve for the oil. The oil still did run and it’s in the sump. Do you think I need to drain it from the sump or can I run the starter with no gas and no spark plugs in the head to try and pump the oil back into the oil tank?.
When I stopped riding the bike it had new oil in. I have an anti-drain valve for the oil. The oil still did run and it’s in the sump. Do you think I need to drain it from the sump or can I run the starter with no gas and no spark plugs in the head to try and pump the oil back into the oil tank?.
In essence too much oil in the sump risks pressurising and blowing the crank case to primary seal.
My seal did not pop out (MKII) but actually split in two. The lip separated from the metal ring. It was likely original and embrittled, but the wet sump pressure killed it. First indication of problem was oil out the primary at felt "seal" , coating back of bike and tire.I suggest you either drain the sump and return the oil to the tank or, add just enough oil to the tank to partially cover the gauze strainer and just start it up (assuming it will start) keeping the revs down until the tank begins to fill.
The 850 Mk3 has a circlip retaining the primary seal therefore, theoretically, the seal shouldn't blow out from crankcase pressure.
Thanks a lot Tornado, I have the old britts one that has a springI had a crank seal in primary break apart from kick starting after significant amout of wet sump oil in cases.
Check if your oil screen at bottom of oil tank is exposed (ie all oil in sump). If level is only down a little, you should be ok.
Btw, what type of anti sump valve? Just the stock MK-III type in timing cover or is there an external type (manually operated or spring loaded)? Spring loaded types known to be trouble and risky. I've got manually operated with an ignition power interupt as failsafe.
Thanks so much!!I suggest you either drain the sump and return the oil to the tank or, add just enough oil to the tank to partially cover the gauze strainer and just start it up (assuming it will start) keeping the revs down until the tank begins to fill.
The 850 Mk3 has a circlip retaining the primary seal therefore, theoretically, the seal shouldn't blow out from crankcase pressure.
Hopefully this will persuade you to toss it:Thanks a lot Tornado, I have the old britts one that has a spring
Hopefully this will persuade you to toss it:
Hopefully this will persuade you to toss it:
I can add that starting within a minute or two of opening my manual AWS valve gives full pressure (40-55psi) at the rocker spindle cover where my oil gauge tee's from. So no worries of priming delay that i've seen."if it's good enough for Velocette, it's good enough for me"
So, it can be seen that IF the oil in the line between the anti-sump valve and the oil pump drains past
the pump into the sump, where is the suction to open the spring loaded ball valve? It can be supposed
that without head pressure of oil from the tank that the oil in the pipeline will not drain past the pump.
Now, I did have one of these installed on my Commando for about 6,000 miles and nothing bad happened. But, I saw
the light and removed it to the trash bin, replacing it with a positive on/off valve with an ignition interlink
which I open 10 minutes before starting the beast to ensure that the pump has received oil. Of course there are
naysayers who suggest that my engine will blow up due to an interlock failure. That would mean that both I
and the interlock failed simultaneously. You think the commercial jets you travel on don't have similar fail/safe
devices?