You've got to watch that late night math calculation, John. I'm pretty sure you are talking about 7,000x1.6/1.13 = 9,911 (~10,000) rpm, but that's not quite how it came out in your post :lol:
You've got to watch that late night math calculation, John. I'm pretty sure you are talking about 7,000x1.6/1.13 = 9,911 (~10,000) rpm, but that's not quite how it came out in your post :lol:
I thought I bounded my analysis by the universe by the qualifying statement "So doing some really (and I mean really) crude (call it half ass) parametric analysis here"
So 13% is well within the bounds of the universe but thanks for pointing out my error by omission. I was only through my first cup-o-joe when I typed that out so that is my excuse.
The Access Norton Website uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use www.accessnorton.com, you are consenting to our use of cookies.