BSW/UNC Caution

Status
Not open for further replies.

marshg246

VIP MEMBER
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Messages
4,914
Country flag
We (especially those in the US) tend to call all British threads Whitworth. In truth not much BSW (British Standard Whitworth) is used in British motorcycles. BSC (British Standard Cycle)/CEI (Cycle Engineers Institute) are much more common (26 tpi). Then there's the BSF (British Standard Fine) which is more course than BSC. Before the Brits attack, I'm no British thread expert – this is just (hopefully correct) background for what's coming.

I've seen the two places where BSW is used in a Norton be confused pretty often. The eight 1/4"x 20 rocker spindle cover screws (06.3124) are BSW for all years. In theory, the three screws that secure the inner primary to the engine are BSW through 1972 (06.0375) and UNC (Unified Course) 1/4” x 20 (06.2669) from 1973 on – I have no idea when they actually changed but it certainly was not 1/1/1973. I'm guessing when they started building 850s they used UNC and switched the 750s at about the same time.

So, BSW and UNC are both 1/4" x 20 but they are not the same. BSW has an included angle of 55 degrees between threads and UNC is 60 degrees. Also, the depth and tips of the threads are slightly different.

In the head, using a UNC screw will re-cut the threads without much trouble and if the correct screws are a little loose it not a terrible idea to run a 1/4" UNC tap through them and switch to UNC. That also opens the choices of screws available significantly but can confuse the next guy pretty bad.

When I use “helicoil” below, I mean whatever HeliCoil-like thread repair.

The inner cover screws are a bigger problem. A 69S that I'm working on had (factory installed?) BSW helicoils but the last person to work on it forced in 1/4" x 20 UNC. In the process, the helicoil was damaged and when I unscrewed them to remove the inner primary the helicoils were ripped part way out. When I took the crankcases apart, I was able to (with a LOT of effort) to get the helicoils out without doing more damage. When I tried to install new BSW helicoils I could see that they would not be tight enough in the cases, so I installed 1/4" x 20 UNC helicoils which went fine. Hopefully whoever works on it after me will realize that UNC is installed.
 
Last edited:
Yes Greg and it doesn't stop there, I while ago I had the head off my 850 and needed to run a tap down the 3/8 centre barrel thread that accepts bolt 06-7918, A friend who is an Engineer advised me double check that it was BSC so I emailed A/N and Simon Amos replied 3/8 26TPI whitform which I believe is BSB- British standard brass which is 55 degree pitch not 60 of BSC, so what else on our Machines that we thought were BSC could be BSB?
 
so what else on our Machines that we thought were BSC could be BSB?

If brass then it's BSB. If not, and 26 tpi then it's Special Whitworth (or 'Whit. form') and not specifically BSB although 26 tpi Whit form and BSB are basically identical.

Also, Whit form wasn't limited to 26 tpi (as BSB was) because Special Whitworth had a range of different (preferred and non-preferred) pitches...
BS 84: 1956
"
BSW/UNC Caution

"
https://www.tracytools.com/taps-and-dies/whitform-taps-dies

Any non-standard BSW, BSF, etc. diameters in 20 tpi (post WW2?) are more likely to be Whit form, and not 'Cycle' thread as the 20 tpi series of Cycle thread was apparently dropped shortly after CEI was adopted into the British Standard series in 1938 (becoming BSC). Cycle (including motorcycle) manufacturers using (BS:84) Whit form for 20 tpi applications.
BS 811:1950 (BSC):
"
BSW/UNC Caution


BSW/UNC Caution

"
According to AN, the 3/8 x 26, 06.7870 rear head and pre-Unified base stud nut is "WHIT FORM"...


...therefore, it would be logical to assume that the 26 tpi ends of the head studs (other head fasteners) and pre-Unified base studs should also be Whit form, not "Cycle" thread.
 
We (especially those in the US) tend to call all British threads Whitworth. In truth not much BSW (British Standard Whitworth) is used in British motorcycles. BSC (British Standard Cycle)/CEI (Cycle Engineers Institute) are much more common (26 tpi). Then there's the BSF (British Standard Fine) which is more course than BSC. Before the Brits attack, I'm no British thread expert – this is just (hopefully correct) background for what's coming.

I've seen the two places where BSW is used in a Norton be confused pretty often. The eight 1/4"x 20 rocker spindle cover screws (06.3124) are BSW for all years. In theory, the three screws that secure the inner primary to the engine are BSW through 1972 (06.0375) and UNC (Unified Course) 1/4” x 20 (06.2669) from 1973 on – I have no idea when they actually changed but it certainly was not 1/1/1973. I'm guessing when they started building 850s they used UNC and switched the 750s at about the same time.

So, BSW and UNC are both 1/4" x 20 but they are not the same. BSW has an included angle of 55 degrees between threads and UNC is 60 degrees. Also, the depth and tips of the threads are slightly different.

In the head, using a UNC screw will re-cut the threads without much trouble and if the correct screws are a little loose it not a terrible idea to run a 1/4" UNC tap through them and switch to UNC. That also opens the choices of screws available significantly but can confuse the next guy pretty bad.

When I use “helicoil” below, I mean whatever HeliCoil-like thread repair.

The inner cover screws are a bigger problem. A 69S that I'm working on had (factory installed?) BSW helicoils but the last person to work on it forced in 1/4" x 20 UNC. In the process, the helicoil was damaged and when I unscrewed them to remove the inner primary the helicoils were ripped part way out. When I took the crankcases apart, I was able to (with a LOT of effort) to get the helicoils out without doing more damage. When I tried to install new BSW helicoils I could see that they would not be tight enough in the cases, so I installed 1/4" x 20 UNC helicoils which went fine. Hopefully whoever works on it after me will realize that UNC is installed.
You could mark it? Stamp the thread size on the case, and/or perhaps more usefully inside the primary?
 
You could mark it? Stamp the thread size on the case, and/or perhaps more usefully inside the primary?
I wish I had an inscription tool for that very purpose. I've written it with a sharpie, but not sure that will last. It is realtively easy to identify UNF/UNC from the head but apparently, most don't know.
 
You'll have more problems than 5 degrees when you get to ½ !
Yes, BSW and UNC are only the same TPI from 1/4" to 7/16". Also, it's not just 5 degrees, it also the shape of the threads at the highest and lowest points - UNC being flat and BSW being rounded; and the fact that the major diameters is not the same.

I am definitely not recommending using the wrong one - this thread is called: BSW/UNC Caution!

At 1/4" x 20, especially into aluminum, UNC will screw in without a lot of effort but then the hole is no longer good for BSW. Screwing UNC into a cast iron or steel BSW hole may work with enough effort (haven't tried).

Screwing UNC into a BSW helicoil will ruin either your day or the guy who follows you!
 
If brass then it's BSB. If not, and 26 tpi then it's Special Whitworth (or 'Whit. form') and not specifically BSB although 26 tpi Whit form and BSB are basically identical.

Also, Whit form wasn't limited to 26 tpi (as BSB was) because Special Whitworth had a range of different (preferred and non-preferred) pitches...
BS 84: 1956
"
BSW/UNC Caution

"
https://www.tracytools.com/taps-and-dies/whitform-taps-dies

Any non-standard BSW, BSF, etc. diameters in 20 tpi (post WW2?) are more likely to be Whit form, and not 'Cycle' thread as the 20 tpi series of Cycle thread was apparently dropped shortly after CEI was adopted into the British Standard series in 1938 (becoming BSC). Cycle (including motorcycle) manufacturers using (BS:84) Whit form for 20 tpi applications.
BS 811:1950 (BSC):
"
BSW/UNC Caution


BSW/UNC Caution

"
According to AN, the 3/8 x 26, 06.7870 rear head and pre-Unified base stud nut is "WHIT FORM"...


...therefore, it would be logical to assume that the 26 tpi ends of the head studs (other head fasteners) and pre-Unified base studs should also be Whit form, not "Cycle" thread.
Oh no, please! Not one more thread! I have counted 6 or 7 different systems already......and now we have to learn one more?! Please stop this madness!!! I can´t take it.......
 
One part of the Norton that had an abrupt thread change is the forks. They look exactly the same on the Atlas and more models of the 60:s, as on the early Commando. BUT NOT ONE THREAD IS THE SAME!! I have bought my forks in bits and pieces from different places and ended up with a pre-Commando front end. So when ordering parts I can not buy anything that fits the Commando (if it has threads).
 
Just to complicate matters M7 fine is near on the same as the tappet adjuster thread and M8 fine is close to 5/16" 26tpi.
 
Just to complicate matters M7 fine is near on the same as the tappet adjuster thread and M8 fine is close to 5/16" 26tpi.
As M5 is close to 2BA for all those stripped float bowl threads.

At last - a Thread thread :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top