Another cam question 4s (2013)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I haven't got a vernier sprocket, but the one on the camshaft has been softened and two more keyways have been broached into it at random. I can get the timing within a couple of degrees of where I want it t o be. I use a two into one pipe with non-standard timings on an 850 cam. Cheap and nasty, but effective. I don't get obsessive about cam timings, but I tend to try different settings with different engine configurations. Tuning for Speed has a table of timings for various old bikes, and if you know what they were, you have some indication of what changing the timings does. If you keep in mind that you are playing with a standing wave in the exhaust right back through the combustion chamber, you will realise that to get max performance, you must rationalise what max revs, BF, and torque characteristics you want to use . A two into one pipe can kill off a lot of power if it is used incorrectly
 
acotrel said:
I haven't got a vernier sprocket, but the one on the camshaft has been softened and two more keyways have been broached into it at random. I can get the timing within a couple of degrees of where I want it t o be. I use a two into one pipe with non-standard timings on an 850 cam.
I have read about many different methods of fine tuning. One way is notching the shaft key and another is offsetting it with a punch and vice.
Question is, with both methods offering relatively the same advantage, which method might be preferred and how many degrees does it give?
 
Offsetting the key is not versatile enough if you want to optimise your cam timings. You might get a few degrees variation that way, however I'm currently running my 850 with the camshaft advanced 12 degrees. With the three keyways I can usually get it to within a couple of degrees of where I want it, even with a fair amount of variation. I believe with a two into one pipe, there is a lot of gas inertia and extraction at different times during the power and exhaust strokes. Need to be allowed for. On any bike the exhaust opening point is critical. If it is too early the bike sounds louder and goes slower, especially with open exhausts. If the two into one exhaust has a tail pipe smaller in crossectional area than the two header pipes, it will usually stifle the motor. On some bikes the manufacturers have obviously overcome this - have a look at the exhausts used on the 750 SFC Laverdas. In this month's CLassic Racer there are photos of Chris Cutler's bike showing the exhaust. It was 936cc and extremely fast, yet the exhaust outlet from the collector is very small.
 
pvisseriii said:
I have read about many different methods of fine tuning. One way is notching the shaft key and another is offsetting it with a punch and vice.
Question is, with both methods offering relatively the same advantage, which method might be preferred and how many degrees does it give?

I've used the offset key for up to 3 degrees of timing change. I don't know how far you can go with it before the key gets too thin in the center, and shears. You can get a 5 degree change just by changing the sprocket and gear settings. I've also used the method acotrel mentioned, annealing the center of the cam sprocket and cutting more keyways. I made a jig to let me broach the new keyways accurately, but it didn't work out too well, so the new keyways were pretty randomly distributed. I cut 4 new keyways in one sprocket, for a total of 5, and two new ones in another, for a total of 3. Using them, I could usually find a combination to get the timing right, but it involved a lot of trial and error. I still think this is a good approach, but needs a better procedure to locate the new keyways more accurately. Between the sprockets I have, offset keys, and some use of vernier sprockets, I can accommodate my needs, so I don't have much motivation to pursue better tooling for the sprockets.

I've used vernier sprockets on the race engines with good results, but they do seem to need regular replacement. As hobot pointed out, the locating pins eventually wear the adjustment holes, and the timing slips a bit. Not a big issue on a race bike that is regularly torn down, but I wouldn't use them on a street bike that gets a lot of use. Again, I'm sure you could come up with an improved design for the vernier sprocket, but I'm not sure there's enough market out there to get anyone motivated to do so. Part of the problem is the small size of the sprocket vs. the number of holes needed to get a fine enough adjustment increment. For a brief while Fair Spares/Norvil sold a version with an aluminum sprocket. That was a real disaster. I tried one, and the pin beat the holes in the sprocket to death in short order. I've used the steel version Norvil sells more successfully, but it still wears eventually. The quality control is also not so hot, so the sprocket is typically not too concentric with the cam when installed, producing a big variation in chain slack as the cam rotates. Still, it seems to work well enough in the engines I've used it in.

Regarding offset keys, I make them up by starting with a thicker key of the right size, and file it by hand to get the desired offset. I've also done it by setting them up in the mill, but for one-offs it's not much quicker than making them by hand. It's pretty easy to calculate the amount of offset you need for a given timing change in degrees. You just need to keep the difference between crankshaft degrees and camshaft degrees in mind when doing the calcs.

The real solution would be for Jim/comnoz to incorporate a vernier mechanism in his gear drive conversion. Right, Jim? Just something to do in your massive amount of spare time.

Ken

Ken
 
Thanks for the input Ken.

I now recall Herb cautioning me on the sprockets usually not being concentric to the cam.

After having done battle with the demons in 500 Ultra Short Stroke Norton Twin valve train (gear driven) I can appreciate what you are saying about the pin and holes beatng themselves to death. I am pretty sure the key looseness (cam and crank) in combination with the weak crankshaft pinion is what did in the 500 last time. I am in the middle of putting it back together and have a few ideas on how to remedy this.
 
Btw please note the loose pin issue is NOT the timing sloppyness - its the risk of the pin working out so valves collide with pistons.
 
lcrken said:
The real solution would be for Jim/comnoz to incorporate a vernier mechanism in his gear drive conversion. Right, Jim? Just something to do in your massive amount of spare time.

Ken

Ken

I'm guessing Jim could figure out how to put in multiple keyways that were 1, 2 or 3 degrees different from "stock" so that you could choose. I don't know really how many you would need to be realistic. I'll leave that to the engineers. But between moving it forward or backward a tooth and having different keys, I would suspect there might be a lot to play with.

Russ
 
I had no idea that sloppy keyways cuts were a potential issue ? Was the keyway - cutter bloke that hung over ? I'm aware many of the toolings were worn out by the time NVT was created. Can't comprehend how changing cam profile(s) would suit.
 
Dances with Shrapnel said:
May be aftermarket cams are the problem. I never saw much of a variance that warranted action.
Yes, my aftermarket cam is advanced 15degrees. I would like to take 2 degrees off that, hence my concerns about modifying the key.

I'm not bitching though, it's awesome cam. JS stage 1. I almost think that the BSA radius lifter may have something to do with it but I can't say for sure.

As far as being a problem, I think some variance should be expected and making some adjustments should be considered part of the game if you choose to go in that direction. Never assume with cam stuff.
 
You could get it right on the nuts by skipping a timing pinion tooth but if you want to get from 15 degrees to 13 degrees I would make and use an offset key for that one.
 
Jerry, RGM can repair or reprofile a cam and also nitride. this is considerably cheaper than buying a new unit. I have had them do a few for me now (standard core to 4S spec) and i am happy with the results.
My results , same deal same cam were disappointing I could see and feel with my fingernail the join between the two surfaces.It is unused on the shelf.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top