- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,099
Here's my experience with exactly what you are concerned about:
Last weekend I did a voltage check at 1500 RPM immediately after startup (Alton E-start alternator, Podtronics regulator, Shorai 18AH battery, Tri-Spark). With the headlight OFF, the battery voltage was 13.48. With the headlight ON it was 13.14. I have no other electrical equipment on the bike. The same battery has been in the bike for 4 years now. Prior to installing the Alton, I had the 180W Lucas alternator/OEM rectifier/Zeners. I had the same concern as you re power output but it has not been an issue at all. Obviously the general condition of the wiring/connections, etc could have an effect on this.
Re the Alton/CNW starter. When I purchased the Alton, the CNW did not exist. My Commando was (is) a one-kick starter but the ability to instantly start when in traffic/congestion was the primary reason I wanted an Estart. So I went with the Alton. After they revised the alternator rotor, it has been superb. Since then the CNW starter became available. I am totally confident that the CNW unit is a superior design. However, the fact that it will not allow use of the standard airbox means that even today, if I was buying a new EStart, I would buy the Alton. But that, of course, is a personal "appearance" issue. I prefer the Alton's "look" on the bike; being less noticeable than the CNW. Again, I am sure that the CNW is more robust and a better design overall as far as a "starting system" is concerned. Whether the better design/robustness matters in routine operation...I don't know.
I exchanged emails with Paul at Alton a few days ago re the revised drive gear that replaced the original type, which I have on my starter. Based on our conversation, I determined there was no need to replace my "old style" gear with the new one. Basically, the new gear allows for easier replacement in the event the gear is damaged. With the original, the entire gear had to be replaced, with the new one, the nylon "pins" are replaced which is a much easier operation. Since I have never had an issue with backfires that could potentially cause such a failure, I don't consider it worth bothering with changing to the newer design. Obviously, if you buy a new Alton, it will come with the newer gear. FWIW when I had trouble with two "exploding rotors" shortly after installation, Alton's customer support was superb. They sent me replacements immediately from France to Mexico at no charge, covering shipping/customs as well. The second replacement rotor was the new (and still current) design.
OTOH, you cannot go wrong with the CNW starter...simply because it's CNW; If I had to put money on which starter would last with no issues for daily use over the next 20 years, I would put my money on the CNW. Will the Alton do that? Well, I guess I'll know the answer in 20 years.
Good luck with whatever you decide!
Last weekend I did a voltage check at 1500 RPM immediately after startup (Alton E-start alternator, Podtronics regulator, Shorai 18AH battery, Tri-Spark). With the headlight OFF, the battery voltage was 13.48. With the headlight ON it was 13.14. I have no other electrical equipment on the bike. The same battery has been in the bike for 4 years now. Prior to installing the Alton, I had the 180W Lucas alternator/OEM rectifier/Zeners. I had the same concern as you re power output but it has not been an issue at all. Obviously the general condition of the wiring/connections, etc could have an effect on this.
Re the Alton/CNW starter. When I purchased the Alton, the CNW did not exist. My Commando was (is) a one-kick starter but the ability to instantly start when in traffic/congestion was the primary reason I wanted an Estart. So I went with the Alton. After they revised the alternator rotor, it has been superb. Since then the CNW starter became available. I am totally confident that the CNW unit is a superior design. However, the fact that it will not allow use of the standard airbox means that even today, if I was buying a new EStart, I would buy the Alton. But that, of course, is a personal "appearance" issue. I prefer the Alton's "look" on the bike; being less noticeable than the CNW. Again, I am sure that the CNW is more robust and a better design overall as far as a "starting system" is concerned. Whether the better design/robustness matters in routine operation...I don't know.
I exchanged emails with Paul at Alton a few days ago re the revised drive gear that replaced the original type, which I have on my starter. Based on our conversation, I determined there was no need to replace my "old style" gear with the new one. Basically, the new gear allows for easier replacement in the event the gear is damaged. With the original, the entire gear had to be replaced, with the new one, the nylon "pins" are replaced which is a much easier operation. Since I have never had an issue with backfires that could potentially cause such a failure, I don't consider it worth bothering with changing to the newer design. Obviously, if you buy a new Alton, it will come with the newer gear. FWIW when I had trouble with two "exploding rotors" shortly after installation, Alton's customer support was superb. They sent me replacements immediately from France to Mexico at no charge, covering shipping/customs as well. The second replacement rotor was the new (and still current) design.
OTOH, you cannot go wrong with the CNW starter...simply because it's CNW; If I had to put money on which starter would last with no issues for daily use over the next 20 years, I would put my money on the CNW. Will the Alton do that? Well, I guess I'll know the answer in 20 years.
Good luck with whatever you decide!