That's a job for someone who's into casting.
[/NELSON COMPETITION ENGINES
121 Pebble Creek Lane
Zelienpole, PA 16063
Manufacturer of NELSON Racing Engines and parts, FAI Pans for F2A & FIC Custom Button Heads, OS65 piston and cylinder sets, many other specialty engine items. (Henry Nelson) Phone: 724-538- 5282
e-mail: nelcomp
@fyi
.netquote]
Model aeroplane turkeys set up their own ' hard chrome plating ' baths . but theyre TOXIC . and I Think , what You WANT , is PLASMA COATING , perhaps .
these guys'd put you onto the plasma trip ; http://www.technohobby.com.ua/en
they almost speak English .
P.S. , in Dies , theres HARd , and SOFt dies . & centrifugal ones etc , gravity is preferred by some , Nelson'l explain there .
Matt Spencer said:Not entirely Ar elephant , but put it on just to confuse the issue . as ive just tripped overit.
http://xlforum.net/vbportal/forums/show ... 79&page=14
And the performance test ( Aluminum steamroller ) again , just for luck . :twisted: in vivid tecnocolour .
http://www.counterman.net/v-articles/al ... roller.pdf
jseng1 said:There seems to be a lack of ambition to come out with all Alum Nikasiled cylinders for Nortons. Steve Maney claims to have done it and found no distortion, but didn't see any economic advantage and decided to save $. Other than that I know of only one other attempt with an earlier alloy - that wasn't perfectly successful.
Note that in my tests mentioned at the beginning of this thread - the iron lined Alum Maney cylinders actually distorted more than the all alum cylinders.
One engine builder is supposedly pursuing this. Other's are playing it safe and watching from the sidelines. If I feel like blowing $1000 on this experiment - I know what to do.
lcrken said:I finally got in touch with Kenny Dreer again, and got some more info on his alloy cylinders. He said they originally had some problems with them, but solved it by changing to a different coating company. After they started sending them to Millenium Technologies
http://www.mt-llc.com/
for their Nickel Silicon Carbide (NCS) coating, and used the rings they recommended, they had no more problems. He said they used standard JE XC7900 rings, which have a chrome faced carbon steel top ring, phosphate coated iron second ring, and chrome faced carbon steel oil ring (SS50U style, with two rails and an expander). These are the same rings I use in some of my JE pistons for cast iron cylinders/liners. Kenny said they work well with both iron and NCS coated aluminum cylinders. He said they originally tried Total Seal rings, as recommended by the first coating house they went to, and they were a total failure with the coated alloy cylinders. I asked him about bore distortion at the top due to the close spacing of the bores, and he said that wasn't a problem. He said they originally honed them with bore plates, but found they didn't need them. He said they didn't have any wear problems with the combination above, along with the custom JE pistons they used. They had good ring seal with no distortion at the top of the bore, and no problems with excessive piston wear.
Just passing information along, but it does sound encouraging for anyone thinking about developing a new design of alloy cylinders for Nortons.
Ken
jseng1 said:Ok - I'm ready for alloy cylinders. I am I going to have to do this on my own? No one else is stepping up.
What was the problem with the total seal rings? Something must have been different. The rings I got from total seal seemed almost identical to the JE rings. Looking at your notes it sounds like the problem was with the 1st coating company. Also - what about the thin alum bore skirt protruding from the bottom of the cylinders?
+nickguzzi said:If I may offer an example from outside the Norton fold, big - 700cc - guzzi's were originally designed with iron liners. When the bore was later increased to make them an 850cc, guzzi adopted chrome bores - quite a popular option back in the 70's.
The larger yet 950cc versions reverted to iron liners, but then switched to nikasil (later using their their own proprietary system called "Nikguzzil" after some disagreement with piston and barrel supplier Gilardoni).
The nub is that the wall thickness for the spigot ended up about 3mm/1/8th". Was never a problem for me, and I haven't heard of it being a problem for others either.
The 1100cc and 1200cc bikes used the later type big mouth crankcases which were introduced with mk111 LeMans with the squared barrel fins and heads. That bike was still only 950cc though.
nickguzzi said:That is true.^^^^ But starting from scratch for a Norton, would it not be possible to strengthen/stiffen the base flange to reduce distortion affecting the spigots? Or is there a more fundamental problem?
Again my experience is with singles. Lots of old style air cooled two strokes have extremely asymmetrical cylinders and manage on similar meagre amounts. Usually with an original cast iron cylinder too, but there are alloy/nickasil versions made.
Friends who attempt to tune them, seize them fairly regularly, but never have the spigot drop off. Bored to 70mm (the max before you run into the stud threads) from the original 64mm, the spigot is even thinner.
Fullauto said:nickguzzi said:That is true.^^^^ But starting from scratch for a Norton, would it not be possible to strengthen/stiffen the base flange to reduce distortion affecting the spigots? Or is there a more fundamental problem?
Again my experience is with singles. Lots of old style air cooled two strokes have extremely asymmetrical cylinders and manage on similar meagre amounts. Usually with an original cast iron cylinder too, but there are alloy/nickasil versions made.
Friends who attempt to tune them, seize them fairly regularly, but never have the spigot drop off. Bored to 70mm (the max before you run into the stud threads) from the original 64mm, the spigot is even thinner.
Only 750 barrels have the flange. 850 barrels are somewhat more rigid but still suffer the same problem. I've spent a lot of money on this and when it becomes available, the money that is, I'll be spending more.