I have recently bought a 1972 Combat engined Interstate, engine number 207857. It does not appear to have the breather modification, but the original system from the lower rear of the crankcase. I've added a reed valve into the breather line to the tank, using a rather neat Ducati Paso unit from eBay (£4.95). The engine is now oil tight.
Experiments with running at various speeds, then stopping and checking the oil level have revealed that the level in the tank does go down at higher engine speeds. That said, it does appear to reach new equilibria, with lower levels in the tank the higher the rpm. Since I cannot hang on for any length of time at much above 4500 rpm (and it is in any case illegal, except in nearby Germany, and there are now many cameras round here), it is not proving to be too much of an inconvenience. One cannot go burning round the countryside at high rpm too much. The number of small villages round here provide the needed respite for the engine.
By the way, the foam filter in the breather line has been removed, so it is a clear path. I know oil goes up the breather line; if I inspect the reed valve, it always contains few millilitres of oil. Plus, when starting the bike after a couple of weeks rest, you can see the oil spitting back into the tank through the breather line until the crankcases are emptied.
At some point, I will get round to modifying the crankcases. The question is, is there any point in moving the Combat breather from the lower rear crankcase up to the timing chest? Why not just modify the scraper casting and oil pickup. If oil does return through the breather, then so be it. It's going where I want it to anyway.
Best regards, Phil.
Experiments with running at various speeds, then stopping and checking the oil level have revealed that the level in the tank does go down at higher engine speeds. That said, it does appear to reach new equilibria, with lower levels in the tank the higher the rpm. Since I cannot hang on for any length of time at much above 4500 rpm (and it is in any case illegal, except in nearby Germany, and there are now many cameras round here), it is not proving to be too much of an inconvenience. One cannot go burning round the countryside at high rpm too much. The number of small villages round here provide the needed respite for the engine.
By the way, the foam filter in the breather line has been removed, so it is a clear path. I know oil goes up the breather line; if I inspect the reed valve, it always contains few millilitres of oil. Plus, when starting the bike after a couple of weeks rest, you can see the oil spitting back into the tank through the breather line until the crankcases are emptied.
At some point, I will get round to modifying the crankcases. The question is, is there any point in moving the Combat breather from the lower rear crankcase up to the timing chest? Why not just modify the scraper casting and oil pickup. If oil does return through the breather, then so be it. It's going where I want it to anyway.
Best regards, Phil.