- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 5,403

Could you write that up, as I missed it skipping through video.Thanks for posting GN.
Interesting to finally find out why the Mk3 caliper was moved to the left and in front of the fork leg.
You single out the Manxman as excellent.Manx Nortons do not look primitive to me. The trouble with Nortons is they tried to be something they were never going to be. A Manxman is an excellent motorcycle.
I also worked in conjuction with designers in engineering factories which had all of the old British structure. They were very self-defeating. I think the 961 might be OK - JUST !
ISO9000 was developed from BS4891 which the British developed during WW2. Deming took ISO9000 to Japan. The British need to take a leaf out of their own book. The problem is that industrial democracy has a role to play in continual improvement. Oligarchs hate unions, so we all become wage slaves.
Yes, it was the cheapest option presumably. Keeping it on the right would have meant new caliper and fork slider castings. I think I'm right in saying that all they had to do was change the hub to a circlip bearing retainer, change the spoke lacing and remove the front stay. Some of the calipers have a steel wiper fitted to the leading edge as well. Not sure when that was introduced.I got why is was put in front of the fork leg, to deter braking lag in wet weather conditions as water would spout into the caliper on the rear, but missed why it was changed to the left. Possibly to ease casting set up at a guess?
Folks complain about the Norton brake, but the swinging Honda caliper was pretty dire when new and got progressively worse as the pivot seized. But back then the aquaplaning pads on all bikes were frightening for the first few seconds. The only good brakes (by comparison) were Guzzi and Ducati who's unplated rusty discs seemed to dissipate the water quickly.Water in the caliper was a major issue on my first disc brake bike, a CB750 Honda. In wet weather I had to increase my stopping distance by about double.
Not only the U.K.Deming and the methods he introduced to Japan after WW2 around quality control were crucial to improvements in their industry. I doubt if many UK firms even now know much about some of those ideas, let alone implement them.
THE basic principle of Deming was/is "listen to the operator" - something many major corporations of today continue to fail on.Not only the U.K.
It’s actually very interesting to go into big companies around the world and discover how little they know and use.
Most big companies are successful DESPITE and not BECAUSE OF their leadership.
Demming et al SHOULD have become irrelevant years ago. But in reality they are just as relevant, and almost as misunderstood, as ever!