ashman
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,600
Because we love them all, not, but really we can't get away from them, the media has just gone crazy with all this BS.yes why indeed.
Because we love them all, not, but really we can't get away from them, the media has just gone crazy with all this BS.yes why indeed.
yes why indeed.
I meant preaching according this this definition:
“the giving of moral advice in a pompously self-righteous way”.
Harry is a Royal not a politician. He is English, not American. And he actually admits to not understanding the very subject he publicly accuses of being ‘bonkers’.
How would you feel if some clueless foreigner started having a go at the fabric of U.K. society?
Almost Sam.Like BBC reporters you mean ?
What scares me is what's her name has desirers to become President one day and if she does what would become of Harry, would he become the first lady or just do as your told first man, just thinking about it is scary enough.
I think George the Third had issues with our constitution as well. I see a trend hereSo, first it was the U.K. that was overtly intrusive and institutionally racist.
Now it’s the US Constitution that’s wrong. Well, he says it’s wrong (or bonkers in fact), but also says he doesn’t understand it.
To summarise: not his country... not his politics... not his business... and he confesses he doesn’t understand it. But he’s still gonna preach to you about it...
Prince Harry calls US First Amendment 'bonkers' and says he doesn't understand — The Mirror
Prince Harry's comments about the First Amendment on the Armchair Expert podcast proved unpopular among many in America, with some arguing the US fought Britain to win the rights enshrined in the Constitutionapple.news
If you pay peanuts you get monkeys.......Monarchs are better for the Constitution than presidents. In Australia, we do not do things by halves, we elect real idiots. And that is not 'fake news'.
Do you think better pay will get you a better politician, Bernhard??If you pay peanuts you get monkeys.......
Much the same with British politicians. . . . .
Most politicians are already rich, its more a power thing and having control, that's if you are in charge of course and of course when they are in charge they look after all their rich friends in business or rich farmers, well in our country anyway and bugger the poor working man and they tax us on everything and always thinking off how they can get more money out of out hip pocket, and it don't matter who is in power, they are also good at lying to our faces and keeping a straight face themselves, they have no consious at all.If you pay peanuts you get monkeys.......
Much the same with British politicians. . . . .
No dispute with this, except not all MPs were rich when they went into politics. Those that were rich employed minions to do a lot of their constituency work as their primary aim is to their political party. Some do it all, but not many. If they can delegate the work while they go off on their 2/3 hour lunches, they are doing well considering nobody gets longer holidays , when Parliament is not sitting, than they do.Most politicians are already rich, its more a power thing and having control, that's if you are in charge of course and of course when they are in charge they look after all their rich friends in business or rich farmers, well in our country anyway and bugger the poor working man and they tax us on everything and always thinking off how they can get more money out of out hip pocket, and it don't matter who is in power, they are also good at lying to our faces and keeping a straight face themselves, they have no consious at all.
Ashley
Do you think better pay will get you a better politician, Bernhard??
I'm afraid to say that the selection process sometimes leave a lot to desire, there have been one or two recent MPs who have had to stand down because they were not fit enough to do their job. I do believe a rigid medical should be compulsory before anyone stands for Parliament, this wouldn't keep out candidates for The Monster Raving Lunatic Party for instance- but you hey my drift.Nadia Whittome, Britain’s Youngest MP, Takes Time Off Due To PTSD
Parliament's youngest MP, 24, hopes revealing condition will help break “shame and stigma” surrounding mental ill-health.uk.news.yahoo.com
That's discrimination, Bernhard, they won't let you get away with that..I'm afraid to say that the selection process sometimes leave a lot to desire, there have been one or two recent MPs who have had to stand down because they were not fit enough to do their job. I do believe a rigid medical should be compulsory before anyone stands for Parliament, this wouldn't keep out candidates for The Monster Raving Lunatic Party for instance- but you hey my drift.