the late John Hudson who worked at Bracebridge street said that the machining of the crank cases was so accurate that they were treated as being interchangable..There is actually an amazing website called workingatamc.. What astonised me was how uptodate the tooling in use at Plumstead actually was.. The engineering by accountants came later and was simply penny pinching. Do not know what year it kicked in , but if i had a Combat engine certainly I would want to ensure the rods had been balanced. 72 saw the most number of revisions to the original engine..
Low & slow, dry rub. Sauce when served..Did you use BBQ sauce or just ranch dressing? Very important point.
WOOOOHOOOOO! Oil thread!!Put another shrimp on the barbie! I think it has to do with the type of oil you baste it with..
T
What are the questions about the followers to which we don't have the answers yet?"43,000 miles (of which, the last 31,000 were well cared, not abused, and there is no reason to think the first 12,000 were different)"
Regrind your original followers for your new cam. Heed Fullauto's comments above. We are not getting answers yet about new followers from AN.
T.
Yes, a small puddle of grey, tar like deposit.Did you split the crank and clean the sludge trap?
If so, how was it in there?
What are the questions about the followers to which we don't have the answers yet?
Aweeee.... man, you know how to ruin a BBQ....What is the material?
Has is changed, knowingly or otherwise, over the years?
What is it’s compatibiltiy to the various options of cam lobe materials in use today?
Aweeee.... man, you know how to ruin a BBQ....
Do
I
Dare
Begin
Searching
?