radiofun said:Is it true that the Commando engine and transmission were built with Whitworth fasteners while the rest of the bike the fasteners are SAE? Or are some fasteners British Standard?
L.A.B. said:Some SAE threads were also used in the engine from the outset,
lbridges said:Not to mention the 2BA threads in the points section, or perhaps the metric parts for brakes.
I've used more variety of tools on my Norton than any other vehicle I've worked on.
Primary chaincase screw, to name but three. 1/4" UNCRohan said:L.A.B. said:Some SAE threads were also used in the engine from the outset,
Name an SAE thread location in an early Commando's engine ??
L.A.B. said:Some SAE threads were also used in the engine from the outset,
Rohan said:Name an SAE thread location in an early Commando's engine ??
marston rhode said:Primary chaincase screw, to name but three. 1/4" UNC
Rohan said:L.A.B. said:Some SAE threads were also used in the engine from the outset,
Name an SAE thread location in an early Commando's engine ??
Rohan said:How do you know its UNC (SAE), and its not whitworth threadform 1/4". ??
....
dynodave said:but the 1/4-20 rocker cover screw on the unchanged head...whitworth threads use a whit wrench not 7/16. Yes the 850 head was "new" but the machine it was machined on was probably the original, and didn't warrant a new tap size.
Significant changes on the engine got new sae hardware such as the cylinder base studs/nuts. and 72/73 combat got 3/8-16 drain screws with 9/16 wrench.
marston rhode said:The 750 head was not a good example to choose - because it really was new for the Commando. The three cap head screws for the head steady had 5/16" UNF threads, the head drawing was new, so it has an 06-.... number.
L.A.B said:The later part number was 06-7745, however the screws were always 5/16" - 22 BSF.